• @DirkMcCallahan
    link
    261 year ago

    The 60% threshold isn’t inherently bad, and I agree that an argument could be made for requiring at least 55% approval in order for a ballot initiative to pass. Here are my problems with the Ohio situation:

    • Issue 1 would make it harder to put initiatives on the ballot, period. The big hurdle is requiring a relatively large number of signatures from EVERY county in the state. This means that a single ruby-red county could single-handedly keep an issue off of the ballot

    • Ohio is so gerrymandered that ballot initiatives are about the only voice available to the population. The GOP has supermajorities in the state Senate and House, even though they only have about a 4% advantage in registered voters.

    It’s absolutely critical to defeat Issue 1.

    • partial_accumen
      link
      131 year ago

      Ohio is so gerrymandered that ballot initiatives are about the only voice available to the population. The GOP has supermajorities in the state Senate and House, even though they only have about a 4% advantage in registered voters.

      Even more to the gerrymandering, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled the CURRENT gerrymandered districting is unconstitutional. GOP lead house and senate in the state simply ignored it and keeps the gerrymandering which keeps them in control of the state legislature.

      Ohioians few remaining ways to make their voices heard is by referendum, which is what the GOP is trying to take away here from Ohio voters.

    • @NABDad
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Ohio should do two more constitutional amendments by ballot initiative.

      1. Require voting districts to be approved by popular vote. Elected representatives should not have that much control over who can vote for or against them

      2. Require any future change to the requirements for passing a ballot initiative meet the same standards it proposes in order to pass.