Sure. Not trying to say otherwise, but they were at least largely quiet about it, they used euphemisms.
It’s the whole “you can’t say n* n* n*” speech from Lee Atwater.
You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*r, n*r, n*r.” By 1968 you can’t say “n*r”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Nr, nr.”
Once open bigotry was more broadly accepted (or at least it was clear that any pushback was stifled) they opened up. And gamergate was central to exposing that, and showing the GOP that there was an appetite for open fascism.
Not to mention people like Bannon explicitly came into prominence through the gamergate movement
I agree with you and the lineage is obvious when looking at how Steve Bannon pushed GamerGate at Breitbart and then went straight on to become Trump’s campaign manager.
And Bannon’s name missing from that article is one of the article’s major flaws, considering how much Bannon shaped the MAGA movement as a whole.
So what is this gamergate thing then? I know the gaming communities can be toxic to say the least. That they were a lot of the alt right that propelled the president to his first election win, only possible though because the democrats threw the election with the most unlikable candidate they could find to repudiate their base and embrace monied interests they are supposed to be the ones to oppose.
Back in the day (90’s-early 2000’s) it was hard to see how the right would ever really appeal to the younger generation (people were less politically engaged in general). There was no "alt-"right, just the traditionalists and Christian fundamentalists screaming about how Dungeons and Dragons is Satanic and shit like that. Those guys were incredibly lame, and very out of line with the sentiment of young people at that time, which was generally a kind of “free speech absolutism,” brought on by being the first generation with access to the internet. Shock images/videos were common and being able to handle that sort of thing was a point of pride. Pretenses of respect and decorum were stripped away in favor of the raw and unfiltered.
Gamergate was the moment when this energy really began directing itself against left/liberal/minority figures, and took on a more explicitly political character. Because sometimes those people would critique video games and commit the cardinal sin of caring about things, while also sometimes disparaging things that people liked. Certain women became targets of hate in certain communities, and it wasn’t long before rumors started circulating that a female game developer (who was frequent target of hate) got favorable reviews because she was sleeping with the reviewers. Thus the famous line, “It’s not about misogyny, it’s about ethics in games journalism.”
As liberals and leftists were not really on board with all the harassment campaigns and violent threats, and they faced more and more criticism from that direction, and they eventually formed into (or at least formed a key component of) this “alt-right” movement that rejected the pearl-clutching and feigned piety of the traditionalist right, while still hating minorities and progressives and all that.
Apropos of nothing, apparently there’s an email in the Epstein files referencing a conversation between Epstein and Moot (Admin of 4chan) implying he convinced him to create the pol board (where a lot of both the culture and organization behind gamergate originated)
Any discussion of the open acceptance of Nazis into the GOP that doesn’t mention gamergate is, at best, incomplete.
The fact that a central part of <gestures vaguely at everything> was some guy making up stories about his ex cheating on him is fucking wild.
GOP was accepting Nazis way before gamergate happened.
Sure. Not trying to say otherwise, but they were at least largely quiet about it, they used euphemisms.
It’s the whole “you can’t say n* n* n*” speech from Lee Atwater.
Once open bigotry was more broadly accepted (or at least it was clear that any pushback was stifled) they opened up. And gamergate was central to exposing that, and showing the GOP that there was an appetite for open fascism.
Not to mention people like Bannon explicitly came into prominence through the gamergate movement
I agree with you and the lineage is obvious when looking at how Steve Bannon pushed GamerGate at Breitbart and then went straight on to become Trump’s campaign manager.
And Bannon’s name missing from that article is one of the article’s major flaws, considering how much Bannon shaped the MAGA movement as a whole.
So what is this gamergate thing then? I know the gaming communities can be toxic to say the least. That they were a lot of the alt right that propelled the president to his first election win, only possible though because the democrats threw the election with the most unlikable candidate they could find to repudiate their base and embrace monied interests they are supposed to be the ones to oppose.
Back in the day (90’s-early 2000’s) it was hard to see how the right would ever really appeal to the younger generation (people were less politically engaged in general). There was no "alt-"right, just the traditionalists and Christian fundamentalists screaming about how Dungeons and Dragons is Satanic and shit like that. Those guys were incredibly lame, and very out of line with the sentiment of young people at that time, which was generally a kind of “free speech absolutism,” brought on by being the first generation with access to the internet. Shock images/videos were common and being able to handle that sort of thing was a point of pride. Pretenses of respect and decorum were stripped away in favor of the raw and unfiltered.
Gamergate was the moment when this energy really began directing itself against left/liberal/minority figures, and took on a more explicitly political character. Because sometimes those people would critique video games and commit the cardinal sin of caring about things, while also sometimes disparaging things that people liked. Certain women became targets of hate in certain communities, and it wasn’t long before rumors started circulating that a female game developer (who was frequent target of hate) got favorable reviews because she was sleeping with the reviewers. Thus the famous line, “It’s not about misogyny, it’s about ethics in games journalism.”
As liberals and leftists were not really on board with all the harassment campaigns and violent threats, and they faced more and more criticism from that direction, and they eventually formed into (or at least formed a key component of) this “alt-right” movement that rejected the pearl-clutching and feigned piety of the traditionalist right, while still hating minorities and progressives and all that.
Apropos of nothing, apparently there’s an email in the Epstein files referencing a conversation between Epstein and Moot (Admin of 4chan) implying he convinced him to create the pol board (where a lot of both the culture and organization behind gamergate originated)
If you don’t know about gamergate, I almost don’t want to spoil that.
This is one of the better summaries of gamergate and how it shaped the “alt right” movement, imo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLYWHpgIoIw