- cross-posted to:
- progressivepolitics
- politics
- cross-posted to:
- progressivepolitics
- politics
For those who haven’t read it, this is the NYT article in question. I should note that the author gets thoroughly schooled in the comments:
A Challenge for ‘No Kings’ Protests, the Third Time Around – by Jeremy W. Peters for the NYT
Archive.world link
(I am aware this site has problems, but it has the content. If you have a better archive link, please post it)



Because when you rise to that level of power to be in the NYT editorial board…
The only non-millionaires you interact with are employees, and then it’s just a handful that talk to the rest.
You can’t compensate for this level of wealth inequality. The powerful will always side with themselves, because that’s their social circle and how the human brain is wired.
It’s the entire problem with neoliberalism.
Oh fuck yes. I have all but given up on the NY Times for politics. Arts and culture and the metro pages are fine, but the rest is just SO tilted to the corporatist wealthy…
Yep. I got distracted when I was posting, but I have edited the original post to include links to the original NYT article, not least because almost every single comment calls out the NYT coverage as a whole, as well as this article in particular, for being, as one commenter put it, “dyspeptic.”
Like this one from New Jersey:
And this one from California:
And this one from Massachusetts:
And this one from somewhere in the US?