Batteries have become much cheaper, making energy storage far more affordable.

  • Buffalox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is actually one of the very few places that US tariffs make sense.

    Not really if you want fair competition.

      • Buffalox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Absolutely correct, we don’t want a competition based on social dumping or highest subsidies.
        That’s why you make tariffs to compensate for that like the EU does, but EU has higher standards than USA, and is hit by tariffs in USA anyway, and although China has state subsidies, the 150% tariff doesn’t make the competition fair, it simply excludes any car made in China from being sold in USA.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why would the US want fair competition?

      Like I said, the consumers do not benefit from the tariffs, the nation does.

      • tburkhol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because US businesses will only compete and innovate if you force them. Leave them safe behind ramparts of protective trade policies, and they’ll keep coasting on 1990s technology, as the country as a whole slowly becomes a backwater.

      • Buffalox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        No the nation doesn’t, it just degrades into further noncompetitiveness, and increased consumer prices.

        • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Short term tariffs can allow domestic manufacturing to reach the design and scale to be competitive without tariffs. This was, in theory, the idea behind the 100% tariffs on Chinese EVs. Of course, none of the American auto manufacturers are doing anything with that leeway other than continuing to be terrible.

          • Buffalox
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You are 100% correct that this is the general idea, the problem is that USA actually had a head start with Tesla, (as painful as it is to me to admit.)
            Now the lack of competition will only result in the loss of the lead USA had until just a few years ago.
            Of course Nazi Musk and Nazi Trump undermine American exports, and no amount of US tariffs can compensate for that.

      • SchmidtGenetics
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Does the nation benefit when there’s no actual benefits like health care for the citizens?