• gibmiser
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      2 days ago

      How much does it cost to not send them there in the first place?

      • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah! Excellent question.

        It is estimated that there are 92 million people living in Iran. The price of a human, ignoring the human’s net worth, has a lower bound of 1 million USD (based off the heart alone).

        With some simple math, it can be deduced that Iran currently holds at least 92 trillion dollars of human wealth.

        Since Iran is considered to be an enemy of the US, that 92 trillion is subtracted off of the US GDP (~30.5 trillion USD), which puts the US in the red.

        Therefore, Trump must reduce Iran’s stockpiles of human wealth to get the US GDP to at least break even.

        I am sure you understand, now that I put this in this very logical way.

        /s if there’s any confusion

      • betterdeadthanreddit
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s a different question. We put them there, we are responsible for bringing them back.

        • Buffalox
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Are you aware how many people could be saved with 2 billions worth of social programs and healthcare?

          • betterdeadthanreddit
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Not specifically but I know it’s a lot. Doesn’t reduce our obligation to rescue the people our country puts in harm’s way (for good reasons or bad).

            • Buffalox
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              The other people are also put in harms way by American policies, there is no real difference.

            • Buffalox
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Doesn’t change the fact that 2 billion could save a lot of people if the money was allocated for that instead of war.

              • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yeah, I get it. After Afghanistan, I heard we spent $7 trillion, and got literally no outcome. Everything was essentially the same as when we started, 20 years before. Think of what we could have done with $7 trillion over 20 years…

                • Buffalox
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Yes, it’s so sad how USA has lost obvious opportunities to improve the lives of their population, actually not much different from Russia. The money was there, they were just spend on making the rich richer and to build an expensive military.

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      How many Americans could be fed or housed for $2 billion? You could save a lot more lives that way.

    • anon_8675309
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      But it wouldn’t be necessary if the no more wars president had kept his promise.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      $2 billion isn’t how much it costs to bring them back; it’s how much it costs to bring them back without making any concessions to Iran. There was always the option where they’re brought back through negotiations with Iran, which would’ve cost far less than $2 billion.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Iran is now claiming the rescue was unsuccessful.

      Given how trustworthy the two sides are, I won’t believe where the guy is until he comes out and reveals himself.

    • ChadGPT2
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Of course. Nobody is contesting that.

      None of this was necessary to begin with- that’s why the costs are being discussed.

      • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, I’m contesting that.

        Stupid murderous scum following the orders of a rapist pig pulling stock market schemes don’t deserve to be rescued.