Honestly this is absurd. These death machines shouldn’t be legal in europe. That thing doesn’t even fit in the parking space, even though the parking lot has the biggest spaces in the whole city. The Golf Polo is so small in comparison, it could even hide in front of the engine hood of the truck.

EDIT: It’s a Polo and not a Golf, I don’t know my cars, sorry for that!

  • @flossdaily
    link
    English
    -91 year ago

    The problem is that when you have a family to protect, you’re faced with the choice of going on the road in a tiny car that will not survive a crash with those big vehicles. It’s really an “if you can’t beat 'em, join 'em” mentality.

    • @FireRetardant
      link
      English
      291 year ago

      People should not have to compete in an arms race to get to work

      • @flossdaily
        link
        English
        -41 year ago

        Shouldn’t have to, but DO have to.

        • Jerkface (any/all)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not okay to endanger other people (and other people’s families, since that seems to be relevant to you somehow) so that you can reduce the risk of your non-essential activities. Yes, I know you “need” your child killing machine to do some of the things that maintain your wasteful unnecessary lifestyle. But what portion of your trips do those necessities really make up? Are you still going to think it is still worth it after you have splattered some innocent family of poor people who can’t afford to keep up with your antisocial practices, when you “had to” drive to the next city because yours doesn’t have the good IMAX theater?

          • @flossdaily
            link
            English
            -21 year ago

            You have a choice: keep your kids safe or keep other kids safe. It is an either-or. Could I live with myself if I got into an accident and someone else’s kid died? I don’t know.

            Could I live with myself if I was driving around in one of those teeny, tiny cars, and my kids died after being t-boned by some drunk in an SUV? Absolutely not.

            Tanks are on the road. That’s reality. If we, through government action change that, great! I won’t miss them.

    • @flucksy_bango
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bigger doesn’t mean safer. About 10 years ago I drove an 06 Corolla. I got rear ended at a stoplight by an SUV going ~40 mph. Their car was totaled. The rear body of my car was kinda mangled, but completely drivable. The driver of the other car broke their wrist and had their airbags deployed. I just got my knuckles a little scraped on my dashboard.

      I drive an 08 Corolla these days.

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Fuck everyone else, I got mine.” Why do so many people post apologia and the lies they tell themselves to assuage their shitty choices? Wrong fucking community. We do the opposite here.

      • @flossdaily
        link
        English
        -2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not apologizing for anything. I live in a world where, like it or not, people are driving around in tanks. Opting out of that means that I’ve be driving around with little kids on roads where our tiny car would be crushed in an accident.

        Not going to let that happen. I’m not buying a tank, but I’m buying a car big enough that it scores high in crash tests against tanks.

        I’m all for systematic change, but pretending we don’t already live in the environment we live in is simply denial.

          • @flossdaily
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m here to talk to the grown-ups about this problem, and listen to serious ideas about the to fix this issue.

      • @flossdaily
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        I absolutely agree. I’d love to see it, but until we live in that world, I’m going to buy a car big enough to survive a collision with the aging boomer in their monster truck.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is so childish. “If you don’t self-sacrifice when no one else is, then you, you’re the one I’m going to call out.”

            Shaming someone for not being the one to make a change you want to see happen on a systemic level while doing nothing to fix the system is such a child’s take.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m not looking for any validation.

                I just think the take of “you’re part of the problem” is reductive and childish. And nothing you’ve said changes that.

                Gas guzzlers contribute to man made climate change yes, but even if everyone went to an electric sedan tomorrow, it wouldn’t slow climate change by more than a couple of days. The average person has no measurable effect on climate change by themselves.

                And yes, you are. Because your resentment is pointed at the wrong person and is like a childish temper tantrum. The person you were speaking too isn’t “attached” to the truck or suv, they actively said they would have no problem getting a different vehicle if their safety concerns were resolved. So calling them part of the problem is just lashing out.

                Resent the people you’re actually calling out. Not the person with a well reasoned argument and the desire to see change that would aid them the peace of mind to support your position. Snapping out at people like the previous poster puts people on the defensive and to dig in their heels, then you just alienate the people who would support you.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    0
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Then stop.

                    You made your position public. That public posting opens you up to criticism. No one obligates you to write paragraphs defending it.

                    Your rewrite was better. As was this argument. But you’re not going to convince anyone that they should subject themselves and their families to being less safe in order to be safer to others. Covid deniers proved you can’t even convince people to be safer for themselves, and get the bonus of helping others. In fact you had politicians out there saying grandpa is happy to die for capitalism.

                    I still think your lashout was childish and I had the time and inclination to call that out. But let’s be clear I never even implied you were a bad person for your position.

            • @flossdaily
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              Thank you. I mean this is basic game theory. It’s in the best interest of everyone to size down cars, but unless everyone agrees to it, the only logical move is to have a big and safe car.

              The way to get everyone to participate is by forcing the change universally through government action.

              • Jerkface (any/all)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                “In a world where murderers exist, the only logical solution is to murder everyone else first!”

              • Jerkface (any/all)
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -11 year ago

                Okay, but IF you get a big and unsafe car (unsafe because it fucking kills children) then you have a moral responsibility not to use it unless absolutely necessary. For the rest of your bullshit, you can just bite the bullet and take the chance, or find something else to do with your time that doesn’t literally fucking kill children.

      • @flossdaily
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        Except that this is evidence based and the gun logic is counter to the evidence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Pickup trucks have worse single-vehicle crash safety. Statistically, the danger of injury and death balances out.