Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) has threatened to sue a publication after it revealed details of his tax returns, which he had sent to them by mistake.

According to Lagniappe Daily, which broke the original story, “In a cease-and-desist letter emailed Saturday afternoon, the former Auburn coach’s attorneys demanded the article be removed, accused Lagniappe of ‘unlawfully accessing’ the information.” The letter further “claimed it was illegally published without Tuberville’s consent, and … it was not protected speech under the First Amendment.”

  • BassTurd
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Yes, corruption via their Netflix subscription. Dumb take.

    You also want cameras in their bathrooms so they aren’t making secret deals while they shit? Gotta cover all your creepy bases.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Why collect taxes either? Before you know it they’ll just take 100% of your paycheck!

      You see how stupid the slippery slope fallacy is as a rhetorical device?

      • BassTurd
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What does this have to do at all with what I said? There are things that should be transparent, and others that don’t matter. If someone has Netflix, that doesn’t matter. This isn’t about slippery slopes, it’s about common sense privacy that every person is entitled to.

        • qarbone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Just in case, because you keep referencing it, the listing that we should be able to peek in their wallet and whether they have Netflix are likely illustrative of the granularity of inspection rather than actual, strict metrics for checking a politician’s financial transparency.

          As an actually metric, I would say that politicians should not be able to move funds larger than a $1000 without reporting on it.

          • BassTurd
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That’s fair. I have stated and agree that there needs transparency. The original comment I responded to was very specific about Netflix and cash in wallets. After I said no, they followed up and clarified that that’s exactly what they meant.

            I’m not being hyperbolic. I’m directly responding to those statements, because that sort of monitoring is insane.