Earlier, after review, we blocked and removed several communities that were providing assistance to access copyrighted/pirated material, which is currently not allowed per Rule #1 of our Code of Conduct. The communities that were removed due to this decision were:
We took this action to protect lemmy.world, lemmy.world’s users, and lemmy.world staff as the material posted in those communities could be problematic for us, because of potential legal issues around copyrighted material and services that provide access to or assistance in obtaining it.
This decision is about liability and does not mean we are otherwise hostile to any of these communities or their users. As the Lemmyverse grows and instances get big, precautions may happen. We will keep monitoring the situation closely, and if in the future we deem it safe, we would gladly reallow these communities.
The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.
Has this been the case in any court yet? Actually asking not just being an ass.
Maybe, don’t know enough of the history of the fediverse to say, but I doubt most hosts can afford to fuck around find out. Those that can are either too small to become a target or hosted where it’s legal.
For example the piracy communities might be following the same laws as lemmy.world, and they’ve personally accepted any risk of being sued in relation to their content, but the owners of lemmy.world are under no obligation to assume that risk for a community they can’t moderate.
.world is (correct me if I am wrong) the largest lemmy instance if they pre-cave before even a dmca is issued then what if any instance is able to “fuck around”. Oh and “fuck around” seems to be in this case hosting links… an issue well trod in court.
Cool, you’re OK with the risk and liability then you host it. Set up your own instance with all the blackjack and hookers you like.
It’s almost like you have no clue how the fediverse is designed to function.
Why assume knowledge of how the fediverse functions the core of all issues? This is a bad move and is a bad look, we have no tools to move instances, these are real issues.
It’s not an assumption, each instance is privately owned and operated, and despite being a global community, each instance is governed by the laws of the country it’s hosted in and the willingness of the owner to open themselves up to liability.
If you want to see the unimpeded entirety of the fediverse you’re free to host your own instance wherever you like and be subject to the laws and costs of hosting that information.
No but the problem is that being right in court doesn’t mean much for legal fees. Maybe once all is said and done, but that takes time. Unless every user here contractually agrees to send 1-5k in event of them needing a legal team, it makes no sense for them to keep the liability.