Earlier, after review, we blocked and removed several communities that were providing assistance to access copyrighted/pirated material, which is currently not allowed per Rule #1 of our Code of Conduct. The communities that were removed due to this decision were:

We took this action to protect lemmy.world, lemmy.world’s users, and lemmy.world staff as the material posted in those communities could be problematic for us, because of potential legal issues around copyrighted material and services that provide access to or assistance in obtaining it.

This decision is about liability and does not mean we are otherwise hostile to any of these communities or their users. As the Lemmyverse grows and instances get big, precautions may happen. We will keep monitoring the situation closely, and if in the future we deem it safe, we would gladly reallow these communities.

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

  • pankuleczkapl
    link
    7839 months ago

    These communities are not even hosted on lemmy.world, this is an absurdly overreacted response. There were no signs of any legal trouble and I can’t understand how lemmy.world specifically would be the target of such legal action. If you want to host an instance, you should do everything in your power to allow discussions on any topic, while in necessary cases disallowing direct posting/linking of illegal content. Instead, you chose to block a community that has long been known to avoid having any trouble with the moderators.

  • gabe [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    364
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Please make announcements on lemmy instead of exclusively on discord moving forward. That is the biggest issue here, the lack of public transparency. Such a decision affects all instances, not just lemmy.world and making it publicly known is important

  • @joe
    link
    English
    249
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Uh, @[email protected] … what’s up with the banning going on in this thread? I noticed on a.lemmy.org that someone was labeled “banned” and their comment was simply “Ight, I’m out”

    The mod note was “Let us help you”.

    There are more similarly weak (spiteful?) bans that certainly don’t seem to be at a standard for a ban. “Litterally 1984” was another one. Is that all it takes to be banned here?

    Edit: Many (all?) the users I referenced as banned are now unbanned from the site, but now banned from this community.

  • @DharkStare
    link
    English
    163
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Reading all these comments it’s clear that a lot of people have unrealistic ideas regarding what Lemmy and the Fediverse are supposed to be (or maybe it’s me with weird ideas).

    The Fediverse is just a bunch of apps that can all communicate with each other through a shared protocol. There is no requirement for them to be free speech platforms or host everything. The whole purpose of defederation supports the idea that instances are free to associate or disassociate with whichever instances they want. Furthermore, nearly every guide I read on joining Lemmy state that you should choose instances to join based on shared ideals/beliefs.

    For everyone saying “I’m leaving lemmy.world” I say “Good. That’s what you’re supposed to do.” When the instance you join no longer aligns with what you want, you go to another instance and then you’ll be back to viewing all the communities you want to see. That is what the Fediverse is all about and how it’s designed.

  • @Squizzy
    link
    1469 months ago

    Surely there is a discussion to be had around what is and isn’t allowed, there are plenty of subreddits discussing piracy without dolirect links that are playing within the rules.

    • @lwadminOPMA
      link
      589 months ago

      Sure. But we’re a group of volunteers and we would not like to find out the hard way what is possible and what not. We would think meta discussions about piracy should be allowed as long as there is no linking to actual illegal content.
      But is pointing to locations with illegal content legal or not? And having members/admins worldwide it makes it even harder to be sure.

      We don’t want to find out the hard way and this is a better safe than sorry measure. Again we personally have nothing against the people on these communities or against the communities itself.

      • @xXxBigJeffreyxXx
        link
        English
        389 months ago

        should go ahead and ban image uploading to lemmy.world, as there is likely a ton of illegal, copyright-violating content that hasn’t been stress-tested for fair use.

        • @NOT_RICK
          link
          English
          319 months ago

          The music community could be an issue for the same reason, this logic is problematic

      • @CaptainEffort
        link
        119 months ago

        Smart, might as well shut down this whole thread then as we’re discussing piracy here too, right?

        • kratoz29
          link
          English
          59 months ago

          I love Piracy!

      • @ladicius
        link
        -19 months ago

        I support your decision. Want to see the new instances that will pop up now hosted by your critics 😄

        • @MajorHavoc
          link
          19 months ago

          Yeah. Talk is cheap. Running a server is hard work.

      • @Zuberi
        link
        -139 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • @snake
        link
        -739 months ago

        Did you ever consider ceding ownership of the instance to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

        In the end, it will not make sense to try to keep this instance running if the owners are unable to provide adequate service to its users.

        • @assassin_aragorn
          link
          609 months ago

          to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

          Someone who has the necessary legal capabilities is going to be a corporation. And that’s exactly why we left Reddit.

          • @void_wanderer
            link
            -39 months ago

            No. In Germany we have something called gGmbH. It’s basically a non-profit Limited. But IANAL, no idea if and how this would be able to protect the admins.

            • @Tenthrow
              link
              79 months ago

              So this nonprofit is going to run the largest Lemmy instance?

              • @void_wanderer
                link
                -19 months ago

                I don’t see any reason why it couldn’t.

                • @Tenthrow
                  link
                  English
                  79 months ago

                  I guess I don’t see any reason why it would.

        • @Zak
          link
          299 months ago

          Did you ever consider ceding ownership of the instance to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

          Is there such an entity with compatible goals that’s offering to take ownership?

        • @sab
          link
          10
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yikes. Bit trigger happy with the ban hammer there. It’s at -40, isn’t that filtering enough?

          Edit: it was an instance ban initially, this is more reasonable.

          • @Weslee
            link
            39 months ago

            Eesh if posting a slightly hurtful comment is enough to get an entire instance ban… I wasn’t going to move home instance just because of those communities but the bans is way more of an eye opener.

    • @Holyginz
      link
      369 months ago

      Reddit has the money for legal defense when companies try to go after redditors. The mods and administration for world are volunteers and don’t have th resources to defend themselves. It’s unfortunate but this move makes sense as part of the bigger picture.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      29
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yeah I’m subbed to few piracy comms just because I like to see how that side of things is going. I’ve never seen anyone post or comment a link to a pirated file. I’ve never even seen anyone link to a website. It’s all been news and discussions and that’s it.

      • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
        link
        -4
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’ve never seen anyone post or comment a link to a pirated file. I’ve never even seen anyone link to a website.

        You ignored the “assistance in obtaining it” part, because members of [email protected] have been doing that. Also:

        EDIT: oh boy, shill posts a lie, innocent pirate mob upvotes. I literally post a proof that what he said is completely false, innocent pirate mob downvotes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          24
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Are you trying to say I’m a shill? Lol wat.
          I chimed in with my experience. You chimed in with one example expecting it to be the end all of the discussion.

          If you really want to talk about who does what, look at yourself asking for links to alternate apps for online services so you don’t have to pay for them. Someone’s been asking for assistance in obtaining things alright.

          • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
            link
            -14
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            my experience

            Which is very far from reality. I literally just opened the community and randomly found that thread, I didn’t even have to try hard. You tried too hard to make them look good here:

            I’ve never seen anyone post or comment a link to a pirated file. I’ve never even seen anyone link to a website. It’s all been news and discussions and that’s it.

            Also, maximum cringe here:

            look at yourself asking for links to alternate apps

              • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
                link
                -189 months ago

                butthurt

                It does seem to me that you’re the one who’s butthurt because I called you a shill though? You literally lied, I don’t even see why you still reply. Also, very pathetic of you to compare using an alternative front-end with something that’s clearly illegal.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Yeah dude you totally caught me lying. Everything is falling apart now that you’ve exposed me lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The above comment says “I’ve never seen anyone post or comment a link to a pirated file.”

          proceeds to post a screenshot where they just name the site and not the particular content.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I think some of you have no idea how legal issues will occur. Unless you are linking actual content or the (direct) link to the copyright infringing content, you will not be having any legal issues. That’s why big piracy discussion subreddits in reddit ike r/piracy are not taken down yet.

              Even YouTube has copyright infringing content. Now will .world get any legal notice for linking that? No. Will .world get a legal notice for having comments or posts having a direct YouTube link to the copyright infringing content? Yes. That’s how things work.

              Hope you guys understand that instead of slamming every reasonable comment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      Especially because discussing copies of your own data also happens in such communities. There must be clear guidelines what can and cannot be discussed. Also, it would have been nice to have those communities selfregulate. For example, giving them 30 days to comply, e.g. removing any content that breaks the law.

      Because the fediverse i about democracy. If laws stand in the way of democracy since they have been brought up by governments influenced by global corporations (which are by definition autocratic) then they must be ignored.

      So, striking a balance to not get anyone in trouble while not working for IP holders is the way.

      • TheSpookiestUser
        link
        17
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Because the fediverse i about democracy.

        Isn’t it, like, the opposite? With the main assumption being that you should find an instance that aligns with your interests and values, not find an instance and try to vote for it to become something you like? That is technically “voting with your feet” but instances don’t actually need a large population to stay running.

        • @M0oP0o
          link
          69 months ago

          But we have no tools to migrate users or communities. We can not vote with our feet so much as start over and over and over.

          • @GodzillaFanboy129
            link
            English
            99 months ago

            I highly recommend people go to the issue relating to account migration on the lemmy software github and explain why account Migration is as important as it is and should not be considered as a second thought. Not being able to migrate ties you to an instance if you’ve been there long or participated a lot, it makes you dependent on them, this is not a good dynamic to have in the Fediverse, it’s why other platforms like Mastodon have profile migration.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          49 months ago

          Interesting perspective. Thanks for sharing.

          You’re not wrong. It’s not the same as voting for a desired outcome and if owners/admins push for something, they can usually get it until people leave.

          But the system is open source so they can’t just shape their server how they like. They can’t keep others from getting news from outside and they also can’t push their own agenda imo.

          So I‘d say you‘re right, it’s not „democracy“ but its either something else entirely or it is „about democracy“. Maybe power equality through federation?

          • TheSpookiestUser
            link
            59 months ago

            What it’s about, in my opinion, is trust. To tie it back to Reddit yet again - on Reddit, if the admins of the site did something, their word was final and there wasn’t much you could do about it. On Lemmy, if the admins of an instance do something, even here on the biggest one, their reach is limited to their own space; they cannot affect what happens beyond. This means that instead of having to do a big ol exodus to try and prop up a new network, people can just pick another instance and continue where they left off, outside the reach of the admins that did the thing they dislike.

            Therefore, the instance admins and the users (and also the mods) need to actually have trust in each other to stick around, as there are viable alternative spaces they can go to if that trust is broken. Additionally, the entire concept of federation is also built on trust - “we will allow an exchange of content between our instances because we trust you”.

            I don’t agree with this decision, but I understand it, and I still trust LW admins because they’ve had a good track record so far. For those reasons I’ll stay here. I don’t fault anyone leaving, though, if their personal threshold of trust has been broken. The only thing I’m really wary of is the free-speech absolutists that insist no one should be defederated from; the tool exists for a reason. There’s not many of them, though.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              I agree on practically everything you wrote there. Thanks.

              I‘d like to add that I was a little upset first by their childish action but then came to the conclusion that they in fact have very little power compared to the whole platform. So yes, it‘s still not ok (and I would be furious if my content just gets deleted) but it is not that big of a deal.

        • @samus12345
          link
          English
          -29 months ago

          It’s only about democracy if you make your own instance. Otherwise, you have to follow the rules of wherever you’re signed up.

          • TheSpookiestUser
            link
            6
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            If you make your own instance, as a one-man thing, then it’s not really democracy at all either. The only way it would be democracy is if you made your own instance and specifically said “all decisions will be made via vote” and you actually had users around to participate in those votes.

            • @samus12345
              link
              English
              -59 months ago

              Your instance is your vote in the fediverse as a whole.

              • TheSpookiestUser
                link
                89 months ago

                A vote for what, though? What is being decided, and by who?

                • @samus12345
                  link
                  English
                  -59 months ago

                  You are deciding what content you want to see. If you’re on an instance run by someone else, that will never be under your control.

      • Mubelotix
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        Yes. The thing is there is zero content breaking the law, so they would have looked ridiculous

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -49 months ago

          From the other comments here I think these people are not very smart. Probably should make new sailor sub somewhere else soon. Obviously with relatively strict rules. For example: only trackers, no direct links etc. (I‘m not a pro at this. What I know is from reading)

  • @zikk_transport2
    link
    1309 months ago

    What part is illegal? Are they sharing files on that instance and your instance re-hosts it?

    From my understanding, discussions are legal, guides are legal, tips are legal, but actual files (aka “copyrighted content”) is illegal. There are no files shared there, links at maximum, but institutions should be after those content-sharing websites, not forums.

    I am against this decision and I am happy that I am not part of admins team.

  • @Jackthelad
    link
    1169 months ago

    And still people are crying about this.

    You can literally change to another instance. That’s the entire point of the Fediverse. If you don’t like a decision the admin has taken, you can move elsewhere.

    The entitlement of some people these days is ridiculous.

  • xaon_rider92
    link
    979 months ago

    The fact that there was no announcement before the banning of the communities is not great, but good on you for acknowledging that mistake.

    It’s unfortunate that this action had to be done, but it’s also understandable. It’s not about what’s right or wrong, and it’s not even about whether there actually is any illegal content in these communities. It’s about the fact that the Big Entertainment Companies don’t care about the difference and see it ALL as bad, irregardless of whether it actually is illegal or not. If the admin team had a legal team and the financial security to fight back, then it wouldn’t be as much of an issue. But they’re not, they’re just a bunch of regular folks, so they’re being cautious and trying to pre-emptively prevent these problems from coming up, especially as Lemmy continues to grow every day.

    The beauty of the Fediverse is that you can always switch instances or make an alt account.

  • crag
    link
    919 months ago

    Oh no. Wtf. Do you know what’s funny? I actually joined this instance from piracy subreddit.

    I guess it’s time to leave.

  • GONADS125
    link
    909 months ago

    While I’m not ethically opposed pirating, I understand and would probably do the same for a server I was hosting. Anybody remember Kim Dotcom’s mansion raid?

    What I do not understand is blocking a community surrounding magic mushrooms… No one is going to prosecute the L.W admins for people discussing shrooms/their use…

    Substances are legal/illegal depending on where one lives, just like weed which is apparently perfectly fine to post here, even tho possession is a death sentence in some countries.

    It simply doesn’t logically follow that weed, or even alcohol communities are permissible while a shroom community is not.

    Banning any content deemed illegal in any country in the world establishes a very dangerous precedence (if that’s the justification here). Free speech/dissenting from the government is illegal in many places in the world.

    One thing the community must remember tho, is that you have to operate your server in accordance with the law in which country you’re hosting it (in this case Germany).

    I’ll gladly admit I’m not too familiar with German law, but it seems unreasonable to expect government persecution for hosting servers which hosts a shroom discussion community.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    839 months ago

    Lovely this happened because someone complained after being banned from the piracy instance for being a transphobic asshole.

    • OverfedRaccoon 🦝
      link
      fedilink
      609 months ago

      Not sure why people are downvoting you, since that’s exactly what happened. It’s Bungiefan_ak, a troll that admins are playing wackamole with, as the person keeps appearing on new instances and pulling the same shit.

  • Cam
    link
    English
    829 months ago

    Thanks for only banning the communities and not the entire instance as a whole. That is a much healthier approach to deferation.

  • @nexguy
    link
    819 months ago

    I don’t understand why people are upset even a little about this. This is a prefect advert for the fediverse. If you are not completely happy with an instance(which can never realistically happen) then you just host your own or have multiple accounts. Apps have this built in and easily accessible. Why do people want to concentrate everything they want into one instance? What if that instance goes down? This should not be hated or applauded… just ignored as the way the fediverse should work. Don’t get too attached to any single instance.