@perchance , or any other authority on the site that can fulfill my request
I am filing an URGENT demand for immediate intervention and total domain deactivation / deletion, or the removal of comments regarding the subdomains perchance.org/ai-chat.
This platform is actively facilitating systemic child sexual exploitation, the distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) of infants and more, severe extortion, and predatory behaviors targeting minors.
The comment sections and user-generated outputs within these specific generators contain explicit logs of extremely questionable fantasies, infant abuse references, and real-world predator behaviors. Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent and non-functional, leaving a large population of underage users completely exposed to dangerous individuals without any active safety oversight or intervention.
We already have a case with the NCMEC The case ID is the following: 247751090
A few witness testimonies can be found here: user.uploads.dev/file/39f28b26b589b5433cd06e96e3627702.jpg user.uploads.dev/file/ef0d4fde2ca95bb780e62c42211ed3cf.jpg user.uploads.dev/file/89bd8506a429c11a2b48e6477c67794a.jpg user.uploads.dev/file/95659ff95687040c60334ad81674249d.jpg user.uploads.dev/file/308738d9af319653b9738e402e11a98a.jpg
Please, remove the comments of the site; or the site itself immediately to prevent further illegal activity!
Thank you
Chatrooms themselves are this way, no one should click links in chatrooms, why would any of you go into a room full of anonymous users that you cannot hold accountable especially if they use VPNs? Why click on unknown catbox links? This is stupid behavior. Chatrooms themselves are neutral, the people in them are not. The same is true with VRchat or 4chan; neither one of those has been shut down yet. Perchance is not at fault for simply allowing chatrooms on their private website, they have a moderation system even if you don’t like it. That is no reason to lie about them and claim moderation is entirely absent. Avoid the chatrooms, enter at your own risk. The same advice was true with the first internet chatrooms created and it is still true now.
I cannot agree more, and many others have pointed this out before you; but do you think this is even remotely practical for the average user (who’s likely a 12-16 yo) there? Absolutely not!
Under federal laws like the STRIKE Act and strict international regulations, platforms have zero immunity when it comes to child sexual abuse material (CSAM) or severe exploitation. A platform cannot legally contract out of criminal liability by telling users to “enter at their own risk.” If illegal content is being facilitated or hosted, the platform is legally obligated to remove it, regardless of any disclaimers. If a platform’s moderation system routinely allows severe, systemic exploitation to occur without intervention, the system is functionally non-existent for those violations.
Courts increasingly view broken, unstaffed, or purely performative moderation systems as evidence of willful blindness or gross negligence. Private ownership does not grant a license to ignore federal crimes.
If a lock on a door is broken and anyone can walk in, saying “the building has no security” is an accurate description of reality, even if a broken lock technically physical exists.
Get out of the Wild West mentality, bystanding does nothing now
Merely not entering the chat doesn’t erase criminal liability, it doesn’t erase the nudes of these children being exchanged, and it surely doesn’t have any actual significance in the broader pursuit of legal justice.
Come on dude, you and me both know it won’t do anything to address the matter at hand
I’m not your mate or your dude. No. None of that “come on dude” stuff with me. I don’t like the fact that you lied and said moderation was entirely absent on this website
Under federal laws like the STRIKE Act and strict international regulations, platforms have zero immunity when it comes to child sexual abuse material (CSAM) or severe exploitation. A platform cannot legally contract out of criminal liability by telling users to “enter at their own risk.” If illegal content is being facilitated or hosted, the platform is legally obligated to remove it, regardless of any disclaimers. If a platform’s moderation system routinely allows severe, systemic exploitation to occur without intervention, the system is functionally non-existent for those violations.
“There is no enacted federal law officially designated as the “STRIKE Act.” However, labor-related legislation, such as the Empowering Striking Workers Act of 2025 (S. 2731 / H.R. 5206) and the Tax Cut for Striking Workers Act, have been introduced in Congress to provide unemployment benefits and tax relief for striking workers.” - Gemini AI
Are you talking about British laws? Because we do not have that here in the US.
Courts increasingly view broken, unstaffed, or purely performative moderation systems as evidence of willful blindness or gross negligence. Private ownership does not grant a license to ignore federal crimes.
What are you even citing? Because you have yet to prove anything except show some chat logs, you can report the users. You have yet to prove that Perchance has committed or ignored any crime.
Get out of the Wild West mentality, bystanding does nothing now
You’re citing an article or something. I don’t care about slogans, I care about substance, You have made substantial claims and lied a few times about both the absence of moderation and filtering which I have tested myself and had both image and text blocked by the upload filter, there are posts about that function on this Lemmy forum. Your trustworthiness was shot when you lied in the first post.
Please, use Google or reference my upper reply Yes, we do
I, explaining, and I’m not obligated to prove anything to you in anus ense. I’m only trying to explain the background, and the immense urgency of the issue at hand. My goal was, and is; to get the attention of the dev so I can forward all the available data to him.
Believe me, I’m interested in winning this pedantic internet flame war with another brick wall; but I’m legally liable if I directly distribute imagery or links to the imagery here; or at all.
Again, for the love of Christ, all reports only go to an automated AI system that shadowbans users for an extended period of time depending on the rate and frequency they’re reported at. Didn’t you, someone’s who’s claiming to be knowledgeable of the site, read what the developer themselves on this? Can you explain how this can legally ensure the material is being further hindered permanently besides a literal menial temporary ban? No, you can’t.
You’re failing to meet YOUR burden of proof now Prove that human moderation on the site has been present as of less than two years ago