• FullPenguin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    A state tax like this has absolutely no teeth. It’s ridiculous to think that any Billionaire would stick around and donate 5% of their net worth to California.

    Unless California also includes a provision that any Billionaire who’s found to have fled this tax will be arrested and charged with something that carries a significant mandatory minimum prison sentence, this law will just be theater.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I could have sworn that it also included language that applied the tax if they leave the state, too, but even if that’s incorrect, who cares? Let them move. The more states that do something like this, the less places they’ll have as “safe havens” and if they move out of the country, cool, again, let them. It sends a clear message: If you won’t pay your share, we don’t want you here.

      Once everyone collectively agrees that billionaires should pay their share, there will be nowhere left for them to run. It has to start somewhere.

      • FullPenguin
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It sends a clear message: If you won’t pay your share, we don’t want you here.

        Once everyone collectively agrees that billionaires should pay their share, there will be nowhere left for them to run. It has to start somewhere.

        Republican states will never do that. They Iove billionaire boots. For many of them, being a tax haven is the only thing of benefit they can provide.

        Unless we overhaul the Interstate commerce act (an article I power… So unlikely) to limit their ability to do business or ship product to/from/through Blue states, we will lose in Federal Courts every single time.

        • P1k1e
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Good let them go. The businesses don’t go with them, you can’t take the property or the infrastructure. They leave, they leave it all behind, it gets broken up and sold off, everyone who matter wins

          • FullPenguin
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Again, that’s not how this works.

            California can’t just seize corporate assets owned by multiple interested parties in order extract funds from one individual.

            That’s the whole issue with this toothless law, California can’t enforce it. Even if they’re able to seize a couple residences, the property in them, some vehicles, etc. There will be decades long court battles over those assets, and they still won’t add up to the hundreds of millions of dollars that a multi-billionaire would be responsible for under this tax.