• slazer2au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Surely that is actually illegal in some places.

    • ProbablyUnwise@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 hours ago

      unless you live on the moon, which legally cannot be “owned” by any country and therefore isn’t under the jurisdiction of any country, then this is, in fact, illegal in every place.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Antarctica is also not owned by any nation, but generally nations claim certain territory and would enforce their laws there

      • slazer2au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        No doubt there are some nations that don’t have rules for this like developing nations.

        • untorquer@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well there’s no way they could pass legislation at the breakneck speeds of the U.S. Congress.

          Like I’m pretty sure e.g. Russia wouldn’t enforce law against a DDoS attack when it’s targeted at an EU/NA based service, but it’s probably still unlawful.

      • slazer2au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That does not excuse deliberately deploying a ddos tool.

        Maybe if he left like he wanted to and didn’t make 3 blacklists people would not be calling him out on his shit.

        Those actually doxing him and no doubt calling for his death are also in the wrong.

      • 𝙈𝙞𝙖@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Making memes and fun of a shitty block list is not illegal.

        Cyber crime, as awesome as it sounds , however is illegal. Not that we would want to bring cops into anything.

        • hash@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah I’m actually hoping they aren’t prosecuted. Cybercrime sentences are insane and this is clearly a case where someone needs help, not prison.

        • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          52
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          ? What do you even know of the story if that’s your take…? They were being doxxed, getting death threats, harassed, etc. all of these are cybercrimes….

          Lemmy users never want to be held accountable for their actions, but love calling others out *shrug*

          If you think it was just jokes and memes, you need to actually read into the details

          What they did isn’t okay, but the response to that from the Lemmy users was equally unacceptable, and their response here is the middle finger.

          They know nothing is likely to happen, because who’s gonna press charges? The people that also did illegal shit that started it…? Seriously lmfao.

          • yuri@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 hours ago

            i’ve been having a grand ol’ time skimming the tea threads and i haven’t seen a single instance of death threats or doxxing. not that it’s not happening, but that’s FAR from the general public response here.

          • Malyca@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I don’t take the word of proven cyber criminals over their victims, as is the case here. If he provided proof, I would, but he didn’t.

          • TrickDacy
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Why do people so often assume total pricks are telling the truth? I doubt anyone here is cheering on death threats/doxxing. I find it hard to believe they actually happened. He provided zero evidence of it.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Eh there’s always that one guy that does shit like this, unfortunately. I’m not saying it is true but it wouldn’t surprise me.

              • TrickDacy
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Maybe it did happen, but admiral Patrick did nothing to convince us and given the whole issue surrounds him secretly doing shit, I’m less inclined to believe it.

              • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Trusting the victims and healthy scepticism are always at odds with each other, but in this case AdmiralPatrick has already been caught in bad faith arguments before where others have had receipts and he had nothing.

                It wouldn’t entirely suprise me if some nutcase actually did send him some death threat, but in this instance I’m not going to just take his word for it.

            • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              49
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Uhh… their goodbye post where they lay it out? That’s what this post is based on… and taken from…?

              Or are you only seeing the one side of the story you choose to see and ignoring the other? Sounds typical of Lemmy users to be honest, so that’s rhetorical.

              • 𝙈𝙞𝙖@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                43
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I don’t think anyone trusts a word they say without legitimate evidence. The user has been shown to act unethical and make things up.

                • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  44
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  And somehow I knew that was gonna be the response *shrug*.

                  Online people constantly do this, it’s joked about since it’s a real thing that ALWAYS happen. If you think Lemmy users are innocent this singular time, is there some Bridges for you to buy.

                  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    You keep insisting we show good faith to a person who has shown themselves to be deceptive and a vandal.

                    You’re either an enabler or a fool.

                  • danekrae
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    22
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence…

                    If you catch me throwing rocks at you, and I yell “it was a little purple aliens fault”; would you believe me?

                  • gezero@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    21
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    Next time you get a fine for drunk driving just tell the police guy:

                    Somehow I knew that would be the response, you police people are all the same…

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                26
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Uhh… their goodbye post where they lay it out?

                You mean the homepage that tries to ddos a lemmy instance if I access it?

                Yeah, no idea why I don’t want to access that page. /s

                • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  27
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  There’s posts and screengrabs about it, never said you had to go there.

                  I never went to the webpage and have found this out.

                  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    Well, if he’d want me to read his temper tantrum, he shouldn’t have set things up that I can only read it by seeking out screen grabs.

                    He doesn’t want me to read anything, for all I know.

                • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  34
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  One side has the general internet on its side. We already know what they do.

                  What other evidence is needed? Any they provide would just be called fake, but the internet always does this. I don’t believe that Lemmy users would be innocent in this singular incident, that’s just foolish thinking.

                  There’s nothing that will meet your arbitrary standards here, but don’t go playing dumb, you just make the rest of Lemmy users looks bad with the rest of you.

                  This is all universal “you” for anyone involved in this drama on either side.

                  • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    27
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    We have proof the guy tried to secretly censor the entire fediverse to promote a conservative agenda. We have proof they committed cyber crimes. There is a pattern of dishonest behaviour.

                    We don’t have ANY evidence of the death threats or doxxing beyond the claims of a man proven to be dishonest. You don’t have any, and try to hide the fact you don’t have any with a weak “you wouldn’t believe it”. The same way I tell my friends “you wouldn’t know her, she goes to a different school.”

                    Right now, the two possibilities are that literally everyone except you has been tricked, or you have been misled by a desperate, proven liar. Take a second to consider the possibility that, maybe, you’re wrong to trust them.

          • m4ylame0wecm@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            The response to the illegal actions then are between the Tesseract dev and law enforcement.

            “Was being doxxed” or whatever other claims were made, are not, and never will be, legal justification for starting a cyber attack on anybody.

            • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              25
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Someone needs to press charges for law enforcement to do anything or even get involved. And to press charges you need to be “involved” or have been affected.

              And that person is gonna get called to court and have their history exposed, courts don’t like people who aggravate others than go and waste courts time with charges.

              Lawyers get disbarred for that crap, it’s illegal itself.

              You can’t provoke someone in to shooting you than press charges, that’s what this would be like.

              • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                6 hours ago

                You can’t provoke someone in to shooting you than press charges, that’s what this would be like.

                That depends entirely on what you mean by “provoke”. The only time you can ever shoot someone and not go to jail for it is if you can prove it was self defense, and the threshold to prove self defense can be extremely high, depending on jurisdiction.

                And for every other type of offence, doing something illegal in response to someone doing something illegal to you just means you both go to jail. “He did it first!” never even worked in grade school, not sure why you expect it to work as an adult.

              • TrickDacy
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Tagged you as “ai simp” a while ago. Seems like you’re full of shitty takes. Also… “Than go…” lol

          • PM_me_your_doggo
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Well, yeah, people who done that should also be investigated. How does this contradicts slazer2au’s point?

            • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              26
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I never said it did? I just said Lemmy users should look at themselves first, they did illegal shit first.

              Or are you taking my response to quokka and attributing that to my first response to slayer? Because that’s not the same discussion. So don’t take that out of context.

              • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                “Lemmy users” is pretty vague.

                Unless you are accusing the specific users you’re replying to of the crimes you’re bringing up, what’s the point of responding to them?

                I didn’t do any of the things you’re bringing up. Why would a response asking “lemmy users too look at themselves” be relevant to me?

                • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  22
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Does the concept of “context” not exist to you?

                  Specific topics don’t need to specified when it’s contextual conversation.

                  That’s what this is, you’re of course free to take it wrongly and interpret that way.

                  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 hours ago

                    You’re whataboutisming along the lines of “you should think about you’ve done first” to people who probably aren’t even the ones who did the things you’re bringing up.

                    You’re not commenting to add that people were dicks to the tesseract dev, too.

                    You’re commenting that people were dicks to the tesseract dev first, and pushing everything that putting it that way implies.

        • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Tesseract is a lemmy frontend a lot of people use. The dev secretly added a blocklist to the software that hides ANYTHING they don’t approve of, which includes: discussing zionism, discussing mod abuse, discussing billionaires, a lot of generic news communities, the Wholesome Yuri community, the dz0 instance, and a LOT more. It also includes over 500 users who didn’t do anything worthy of a ban (at least of that scale).

          It’s nakedly a single person trying to force their own agenda. They got called out, and they took it as well as you could expect. Which is to say, they’re crashing out HARD.

            • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 hours ago

              And any discussion of pedophiles, or the epstein class. Seriously, you can keep looking through that list and it’ll keep getting worse and worse, but I had to click “reply” at SOME point.

              • frongt@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 hour ago

                And ACAB, beans, the word perchance, and 👉👈.

                Truly, the worst of the worst.