There is impetus to the proof that she is MAGA though (Charlie Kirk fan), and the silence around condemning an obviously fascist movement like MAGA is someone damning. I’d argue that the ball is very much in her court if she wishes to alter public perception of herself
All that following Charlie Kirk proves is that she clicked a button once. Literally that’s the sum total of the evidence.
It’s entirely possible that she’s not even aware of what her “public perception” from a few internet oddbods even is.
Look, I’ve been called MAGA in the past and I:
A: Am British
B: Have literally been on a march to protest Parliament’s decision not to ban Donald Trump from the UK (back in 2016)
C: Would rather pay 100% tax than have a system that allows billionaires to exist
The internet is full of people who are eager to assume the worst about people. The world is horrible enough - if this woman hasn’t actually done or said anything bad, then let’s leave her be.
Sorry, no can do. I’ve never had an Instagram account, a Facebook account, a Bluesky account, a Snapchat account or anything like that.
My entire social media presence is/was a Twitter account that I abandoned even before Elon Musk bought it (because Twitter was turning into a tyre fire even back then), a Reddit account that I abandoned during the great exodus, and a YouTube account that I posted a single video on in 2012. And this, of course.
Also… Are you genuinely using the fact that someone uses Google as evidence that they’re a bad person?
Yet, open source web crawlers exist.
Nobody told Deedee to make Instagram & YouTube accunts. She can readily create&host her own pixelfed&peertube accounts, and post “🖕MAGA.”
I did this, and I don’t have her budget.
Sorry, but this is bad form.
The onus of proof is on you proving she’s MAGA, not on her proving she’s not.
To do something like this, something she will likely never see, and say that you’ll take it down if she proves your theory otherwise, is unfair.
Kudos for the seamless edit, but it’s not a cool thing to do.
There is impetus to the proof that she is MAGA though (Charlie Kirk fan), and the silence around condemning an obviously fascist movement like MAGA is someone damning. I’d argue that the ball is very much in her court if she wishes to alter public perception of herself
All that following Charlie Kirk proves is that she clicked a button once. Literally that’s the sum total of the evidence.
It’s entirely possible that she’s not even aware of what her “public perception” from a few internet oddbods even is.
Look, I’ve been called MAGA in the past and I:
The internet is full of people who are eager to assume the worst about people. The world is horrible enough - if this woman hasn’t actually done or said anything bad, then let’s leave her be.
Show me your instagram acc., and we call this even. I already proved she uses fascist services.
Sorry, no can do. I’ve never had an Instagram account, a Facebook account, a Bluesky account, a Snapchat account or anything like that.
My entire social media presence is/was a Twitter account that I abandoned even before Elon Musk bought it (because Twitter was turning into a tyre fire even back then), a Reddit account that I abandoned during the great exodus, and a YouTube account that I posted a single video on in 2012. And this, of course.
Also… Are you genuinely using the fact that someone uses Google as evidence that they’re a bad person?
Funny how the anti-bully ranger tried to bully you into sharing your identifiable socials
Then let’s pray she does too.
Are you not?
I mean, Google has over 90% of the global search engine market share - I think it’s safe to assume that most of those users are not MAGA.
Yet, open source web crawlers exist.
Nobody told Deedee to make Instagram & YouTube accunts. She can readily create&host her own pixelfed&peertube accounts, and post “🖕MAGA.”
I did this, and I don’t have her budget.