alphacyberranger to World NewsEnglish • 10 months agoGerman government approves controlled legalization of cannabis usewww.marca.comexternal-linkmessage-square121arrow-up1597arrow-down115
arrow-up1582arrow-down1external-linkGerman government approves controlled legalization of cannabis usewww.marca.comalphacyberranger to World NewsEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square121
minus-squareFlying SquidcakeMlinkEnglish3•10 months agoBeing ‘pretty sure’ is not scientific evidence. You have none.
minus-squarediprount_tomatolinkEnglish-2•10 months agoI’ve literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward system
minus-squareFlying SquidcakeMlinkEnglish4•10 months agoYes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don’t think you even read it. You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would. It is simply not physically addictive. I don’t know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn’t.
minus-squarediprount_tomatolinkEnglish-1•10 months agoIf you don’t think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insist
minus-squareFlying SquidcakeMlinkEnglish3•10 months agoAgain- feel free to present scientific evidence.
minus-squarediprount_tomatolinkEnglish-1•10 months agohttps://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuana
minus-squareFlying SquidcakeMlinkEnglish2•10 months agoOnce again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.
minus-squarediprount_tomatolinkEnglish-1•10 months agoUnlike “Why weed should be legal”, a news article cited in this same post
minus-squareFlying SquidcakeMlinkEnglish3•10 months agoI did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn’t relevant. Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?
Being ‘pretty sure’ is not scientific evidence. You have none.
I’ve literally linked you a source that says THC messes with the reward system
Yes. And that is not the same as physical addiction. I already told you that. Your source does not prove your claim. I don’t think you even read it.
You do not go into withdrawal if you stop using cannabis even if you have used it for 20 years. If it was physically addictive, you would.
It is simply not physically addictive.
I don’t know why it has to be physically addictive for you to have a problem with it, but it still isn’t.
If you don’t think you go through drug withdrawal syndrome when leaving weed try not using it for a year, I insist
Again- feel free to present scientific evidence.
https://americanaddictioncenters.org/withdrawal-timelines-treatments/weed-marijuana
Once again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.
Unlike “Why weed should be legal”, a news article cited in this same post
I did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn’t relevant.
Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?