• Nouvellalia
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You really just replied to my comment saying that is insufficient, under an article saying that is insufficient, with ‘that is sufficient’?

    • MrTolkinghoen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Um… What does blocking all internet access not prevent here? By isolated VLAN I mean isolated. I.e. fully blocked from internet access LAN local replies only. 0 WAN access.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        if a device manufacturer is so hell bent on their devices phoning home that they’ll connect to an insecure wifi or a wifi network run by a ‘partner’ provider… they’re gonna be doing that whenever it can’t phone home via a configured network connection, too, and not just when there isn’t one set up.

      • Nouvellalia
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It doesn’t prevent exactly what my comment said it doesn’t prevent ‘an adversarial entity physically residing within the space’. If I showed up with a pi bristling with antennas, loaded with an unknown, encrypted payload, and plopped it into your living room, would you just hook it into a vlan and be like “there, now I’m safe”?