• @someguy3
    link
    English
    65
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Ohio teenager dubbed “hell on wheels” — who was convicted of intentionally crashing her car at 100 mph into a building, killing her boyfriend and his friend — was sentenced to two concurrent 15 years to life sentences Monday.

    Judge Russo shared blistering remarks and condemned Shirilla’s actions saying: “She had a mission, and she executed it with precision. The mission was death.”

    Judge Russo said in handing down her verdict remarks that Shirilla was “literal hell on wheels,” saying she intentionally drove at an hour when not many witnesses would be around, on a path she didn’t routinely use but had visited days before.

    Prosecutors argued in the trial that Shirilla had become turbulent and threatening towards her boyfriend and crashed to end their relationship.

    • bioemerl
      link
      fedilink
      701 year ago

      Misleading as hell titles for this running around. I thought she was just driving fast based on what I saw in the headlines last week. She totally deserves the murder charges.

      • @Melonpoly
        link
        English
        -301 year ago

        I mean, causing a crash and killing someone in the process of speeding is still deserving of a murder sentence.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I believe stateside it’s called ‘manslaughter’ in a case such as that. Manslaughter is “the crime of killing a human being without malice aforethought, or otherwise in circumstances not amounting to murder.” So no, it wouldn’t be deserving of a murder sentence… Edit: Unless the jury or judge deemed it so, of course.

          • @Dultas
            link
            51 year ago

            To make matters even more confusing it all depends on state. Most have manslaughter and for a couple it would be 3rd degree murder.

        • @foggy
          link
          English
          -61 year ago

          There are judges in North Dakota, North Carolina, Florida, Tennessee and Texas that would say “well, were they protesting or something?”

          Food for thought.