That seems to leave room for fully vibe coded apps as long as it’s made with real thought and effort. Some of the anti-AI absolutists are going to have a problem with that.
I’ve always interpreted it as not actually typing any of the code yourself. At least that seems to be the way people that are angry about it are using it.
That’s the line I draw. Same with art or anything else. I’m okay with using AI as an oracle or a tool to check work but the finished product should be human brain -> human hands -> project
It sounds reasonable to me. Understanding the architecture of your project is always critical. It leaves room for responsible AI use, though it could be hard to verify. That’s also been a problem since before LLMs really became a thing (we’ve been complaining about people copy pasting code from stack overflow since it got popular), so I don’t know if it really changes much. I don’t see the anti-AI crowd ever changing their minds.
What is slop, though? What’s your definition?
Copy paste output without validation and/or effort.
That’s a good definition, in fact I am bookmarking that to remember later.
Slop is just low effort in my view.
So if you just generate with ai without any real thought, thats slop because it is low effort.
The people posting just the “never slop” kitto are low effort too.
That seems to leave room for fully vibe coded apps as long as it’s made with real thought and effort. Some of the anti-AI absolutists are going to have a problem with that.
Fuck absolutist in general and under any circumstances.
What does vibe coded mean to you?
As I understand vibe coded means just pressing enter without checking the code and understanding it?
I’ve always interpreted it as not actually typing any of the code yourself. At least that seems to be the way people that are angry about it are using it.
That’s the line I draw. Same with art or anything else. I’m okay with using AI as an oracle or a tool to check work but the finished product should be human brain -> human hands -> project
For me it doesn’t matter if you type it as long as you understand it and it makes sense how it is written.
I can get behind that definition.
What’s your position on all that?
It sounds reasonable to me. Understanding the architecture of your project is always critical. It leaves room for responsible AI use, though it could be hard to verify. That’s also been a problem since before LLMs really became a thing (we’ve been complaining about people copy pasting code from stack overflow since it got popular), so I don’t know if it really changes much. I don’t see the anti-AI crowd ever changing their minds.
Thanks for contributing nothing to the discussion. At this point LLMs are more insightful than you are.
…U mad bro?
I mean yeah, the person you’re replying to made it pretty clear they resent you
Which I agree with, you might as well be a bot
I was just trolling a little by copying someone else’s thread, no bad blood here.
Yeah I’m a little bit dumb
We had a great thing going on. Don’t let anyone take that away from you.
Are you serious?
Oh gosh I just realised the usernames swapped around
This whole thread is still a bit of a wank though
Pretty judgmental.
If they didn’t hire someone to generate code or art, then it’s slop.