As I’ve noted, these leadership challenges don’t mean a lot if they don’t include abolishing the filibuster. This afternoon Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD)…
It’s far easier to get rid of the filibuster; that’s a rules change that a majority of the Senate can vote into place.
Getting rid of the Senate means replacing the constitution entirely: the structure of the Senate is the one thing amendments are not allowed to replace
To be fair…
So does the Senate.
It’s by definition undemocratic.
It’s far easier to get rid of the filibuster; that’s a rules change that a majority of the Senate can vote into place.
Getting rid of the Senate means replacing the constitution entirely: the structure of the Senate is the one thing amendments are not allowed to replace