Driverless cars worse at detecting children and darker-skinned pedestrians say scientists::Researchers call for tighter regulations following major age and race-based discrepancies in AI autonomous systems.

  • @666dollarfootlong
    link
    English
    241 year ago

    Wouldn’t good driverless cars use radars or lidars or whatever? Seems like the biggest issue here is that darker skin tones are harder for cameras to see

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Tesla removed the LiDAR from their cars, a step backwards if you ask me.

      Edit: Sorry RADAR not LiDAR.

      • @skyspydude1
        link
        English
        131 year ago

        They removed the radars, they’ve never used LiDAR as Elon considered it “a fool’s errand”, which translates to “too expensive to put in my penny pinched economy cars”. Also worth noting that they took the radars out purely to keep production and the stock price up, despite them knowing well in advance performance was going to take a massive hit without it. They just don’t give a shit, and a few pedestrian deaths are 100% worth it to Elon with all the money he made from the insane value spike of the stock during COVID. They were the one automaker who maintained production because they just randomly swapped in whatever random parts they could find, instead of anything properly tested or validated, rather than suck it up for a bad quarter or two like everyone else.

      • @dx1
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Seems like Tesla is really not going to be the market leader on this. IDK if anytime else caught those videos by the self driving tech expert going through all the ways Tesla is bullshitting about it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Hey, they’ll have full self driving tech next year!

          Source: Elon Musk, every year, for like the last ten years.

        • Eager Eagle
          link
          English
          -21 year ago

          Elon’s bullshit aside, they are leading self driving and the company with most data to train machine learning models on, by FAR.

          Their self driving challenges are not a result of data acquisition, adding LIDAR to the mix would not be helpful. Pedestrian detection is not the big unsolved problem this article makes it sound like.

          • @DoomBot5
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            If the latest FSD update is anything to go buy, they won’t be a leader for much longer if every release makes it worse.

    • @mint_tamas
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      I think many driverless car companies insist on only using cameras. I guess lidars/radars are expensive.

      • @skyspydude1
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        They’re basically the only one. Even MobilEye, who is objectively the best in the ADAS/AV space for computer vision, uses other sensors in their fleet. They have demonstrated camera only autonomy, but realize it’s not worth the $1000 in sensors to risk killing people.

      • @rDrDr
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Even Comma.AI, which is vision-only internally, still implicitly relies on the cars built in radar for collision detection and blind spot monitoring. It’s just Tesla.

        • @DoomBot5
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          To be fair, that’s because most cars aren’t equipped with cameras for blind spot detection.

          • @rDrDr
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Thats because cameras aren’t good for blind spot detection. Moreover, even for cars that have cameras on the side, the Comma doesn’t use them. AFAIK, in my car with 360 cameras, the OEM system doesn’t use the cameras either for blind spot.