• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I think we agree but I still need to point out: Individual transport will always be a requirement for living in rural areas. The “fuck cars” sentiment only makes sense in cities with more than ~3 million inhabitants.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      While I agree with the sentiment on cars in the city, I’d say that it is already viable in much smaller cities. I live in a city with 350k inhabitants and I’m doing quite well without a car.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 year ago

        For sure. But forbidding cars doesn’t make sense until you have several millions of people in a single city.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      What are you smoking lmao, do you seriously think anything below 3 million people is rural?

      rural is when it takes you an hour to reach the nearest grocery store by car.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        That’s not rural, that’s ultra remote wilderness. Like what place doesn’t have a grocery store in a 100km radius? Some place deep in the Australian outback?

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          Village of ~10k, nearest grocery store is 25min walk, 10min bike, 5min car.

          There are also three smaller stores a 2 min walk away. Europe for reference

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I sincerely doubt there is a a place in Europe outside of maybe remote Scandinavia or Russia where you can’t get to a grocery store after driving for an hour.