• @RanchOnPancakes
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    I mean on one hand, terrible behavior. On the other, good.

    • NaibofTabr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      I mean, if it’s just a switch to Bing it’s not really any better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        I mean I see your point, but you cold also argue that anything that can weaken a monopoly is a good thing, in the grand scheme of things

        • idotherock
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Who’s monopoly are we talking about? If that’s the goal then Firefox + DuckDuckGo would be more sensible right?

          • @Darorad
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            100% but Microsoft and Google splitting 50 - 50 would be better than the current Google 90 - 9.9 - 0.1 it currently is.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            DuckDuckGo’s search results suck, is there another alternative I can use that gets its indexes from google? I don’t care about censorship

            • idotherock
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I think Ecosia pulls results from Bing if that’s any better? I use them occasionally but generally prefer DDG.

                • idotherock
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Ah yeh, I tried StartPage for a while. IIRC the image results page wasn’t so great. Not many filter options and so on.

      • @RanchOnPancakes
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        I mean, if it’s just a switch to Bing it’s not really any better.

        Search wise? No. Competition wise? Yes.

        Google has too much power.