• @fubo
    link
    101 year ago

    Y’all oughtta distinguish “y’all” from “all y’all”.

    • partial_accumen
      link
      11 year ago

      I thought the distinction was clear:

      • y’all - singular
      • all y’all - plural
      • VulKendov
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        That’s not right:

        • you - singular
        • y’all - plural
        • all y’all - superplural

        Y’all refers to multiple people, all y’all refers to multiple groups of people

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My understanding:

          • you: the person I’m talking to
          • y’all: the group of folks I’m talking to
          • all y’all: y’all, plus anyone else that could possibly be addressed by me (everyone in voice range)

          (Agreeing and using different words to say the what I think is the same thing)

      • @aussieskibum
        link
        31 year ago

        I feel like y’all covers up to ~3 and “all y’all” (my favourite Americanism) is reserved for more than that?

        • Dharma Curious
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          As a born and raised southerner, y’all can be used for one person or many, with no clear limit on the number. All y’all is used to stress a point or to make it clear that it references everyone capable of hearing the message or just anyone who could be intended. All y’all is mainly used, in real world applications, in the sentence “all y’all can go fuck y’allself” or similar.

      • @fubo
        link
        11 year ago

        I thought that’s the plural genitive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          While I won’t disagree, is a discussion about “y’all” really the place for a phrase like “plural genitive”? ;)

          • @fubo
            link
            31 year ago

            Southern US English is a language, and is therefore a proper subject for linguistics, so … yes?