• @AteshgaRubyTeeth
      link
      English
      461 year ago

      Can imagine buying this if you’re in an long distance relationship and into chastity.

      The company is the bad guy here, there’s no need to victim blame just because their kink doesn’t match yours.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        im not saying the company isnt to blame, all im saying is a smart chastity belt is about the same level as a a smart shoe

        • Flying Squid
          link
          English
          141 year ago

          I don’t know, if that’s the kink, that’s the kink. It’s not harming anyone who didn’t consent to it, so why kink shame them when they’re the ones who have been wronged?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            literally never said anything about their kink did i. Their kink doesnt matter, them buying a needlessly “smart” smartdevice does

            • Flying Squid
              link
              English
              91 year ago

              But the ability to control the chastity belt over the internet is part of the kink. That was my point.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                5
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Oh, well, I apologize for accidentally making it appear that i kinkshamed them

                I will however not retract calling them dumb

        • @SCB
          link
          English
          51 year ago

          A lot of kink relationships are long-distance. This sort of product appeals to someone in a kinky LDR.

      • @nxfsi
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Having a unique use case doesn’t mean it’s still not an incredibly stupid product. Same as with smart door locks, smart safes, smart guns and smart “full self driving” cars.