• @AteshgaRubyTeeth
    link
    English
    461 year ago

    Can imagine buying this if you’re in an long distance relationship and into chastity.

    The company is the bad guy here, there’s no need to victim blame just because their kink doesn’t match yours.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      im not saying the company isnt to blame, all im saying is a smart chastity belt is about the same level as a a smart shoe

      • Flying Squid
        link
        English
        141 year ago

        I don’t know, if that’s the kink, that’s the kink. It’s not harming anyone who didn’t consent to it, so why kink shame them when they’re the ones who have been wronged?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          literally never said anything about their kink did i. Their kink doesnt matter, them buying a needlessly “smart” smartdevice does

          • Flying Squid
            link
            English
            91 year ago

            But the ability to control the chastity belt over the internet is part of the kink. That was my point.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Oh, well, I apologize for accidentally making it appear that i kinkshamed them

              I will however not retract calling them dumb

      • @SCB
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        A lot of kink relationships are long-distance. This sort of product appeals to someone in a kinky LDR.

    • @nxfsi
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Having a unique use case doesn’t mean it’s still not an incredibly stupid product. Same as with smart door locks, smart safes, smart guns and smart “full self driving” cars.