Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia on Sunday said that he believes a strong legal argument can be made to use the 14th Amendment to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot in 2024, citing Trump’s actions related to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Shortly after Jan. 6, Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives for inciting an insurrection amid his push to overturn his election loss, with 10 Republicans and all Democrats voting to impeach him.

He denied any wrongdoing, and while seven members of his own party joined Democrats to support his conviction, he was ultimately acquitted by the Senate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    I’m sick of articles saying things like “a case could be made”. Just fucking do it already. Someone needs to start suing to to get Trump off the ballot and not just talk about it.

    • actually…a lot of people need to do something. which is the purpose behind talking about it first. getting support and consensus for possibly making a case can lead to cases actually being made. it’s not like on TV where the district attourney of america walks up to the judge of america and convicts him. educating people why there are arguments and convincing them they are powerful don’t happen overnight.

    • @fubo
      link
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A lawsuit isn’t required, if the state election officials do the right thing.

      An insurrectionist is an ineligible candidate for US president, just like a non-citizen or someone who’s not 35 yet. The states merely need to follow that existing law, just as they would do if a teenager named Pierre from Paris filed to run for US president. They wouldn’t have to be sued to say no; and Pierre wouldn’t have to be convicted of anything — they’d just say no, he’s not eligible, he doesn’t get listed on the ballot.

      Trump is not eligible, just as Pierre is not eligible. Trump’s ineligibility rests on his own actions rather than his age or nationality. But all of those are (dis)qualifications spelled out in the Constitution; they’re not civil or criminal penalties from a court. It’s the job of election officials to enforce them, and a lawsuit only makes sense if they fail to do their job correctly in the first place.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I suppose a lawsuit isn’t required until the appropriate election official announces a decision, but Trump & co will definitely contest it if he’s not going to be on the ballot, and I really hope someone will contest it if he is.

    • @CharlesDarwin
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      So much this. It feels like 2015-2016 all over again and I’m so sick of it already.