• redfellow
    link
    fedilink
    41
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s because the law wasn’t made because rich assholes, but because broken exhausts, wether by design or by negligence, are a god damn nuisance.

    • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
      link
      421 year ago

      And yet the people who’s cars are loud by design are largely ignored because fuck the poor.

      “Hey I see your muffler is broken”

      “Yeah I don’t have the money to fix it”

      “Well now you’ll have even less money, here’s your $150 ticket”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes yes, we’re all aware that something that inconveniences you for all of 5 seconds is worse than someone living at an income low enough to not allow them to fix a non essential part of their only source of transportation.

      • @uis
        link
        -111 year ago

        Or you can just choose to not use car.

        • Wrench Wizard
          link
          141 year ago

          Ah, yes, in my rural area that would mean walking or biking 200+ miles per day just for work and even if I was capable of that it doesn’t solve the problem of not being able to bring my tools so I can work which weigh hundreds if not a thousand pounds.

          And there aren’t buses around here, not that it would solve the problem of getting my tools around. I’m all for saving the environment and establishing smaller, walkable cities but it doesn’t negate the need for automobiles - yet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is this a bit or do you seriously underestimate how much of non-walkable cities depend on cars?