• Obinice
    link
    English
    01 year ago

    She’s an absolute scumbag, but yes, certain dog breeds that only exist to be violent, such as Rottweilers, should simply be ended. That’s pretty obvious, I would have thought.

    But… Violent people don’t care about the safety of others, and don’t see a problem with abusing dogs to get what they want out of them either.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Rottweilers aren’t known for being particularly violent though. Yes they’re big dogs, but they’re largely big softies personality wise.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Rottweilers are responsible for the second highest number of attacks after pitbulls. They seem to be at least more dangerous than the average dog.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Clearly theres an issue with this breed given how many incidents they’re responsible for of late.

          • @jose1324
            link
            English
            -11 year ago

            Maybe they attract a certain type of owner. Who knows…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      You know nothing about dogs. If you raise them in an uun-abusive way they will not be violent.

      Don’t be fucking surprised when a living creature lashes out and bites you after years of you hitting of yelling at it. Treat dogs with respect and they’ll respect you back.

      If they happen to maim a home invader, who cares? They could have prevented it by being functional members of society instead of a scurge.