NASA clears the air: No evidence that UFOs are aliens
arstechnica.com
NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific.

No evidence that UFOs are aliens — NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific::NASA attempts to make conversations about aerial phenomena more scientific.

  • @Poem_for_your_sprogEnglish
    -1•1 year ago

    Tic tac was recorded on video by the navy accelerating at ~200G. It was also witnessed by 8 highly trained aircrew, including top gun graduates.

          • Cosmic ClericEnglish
            1•1 year ago

            Idk why these people are all denying these uaps when the government has literally come out and confirmed they are their videos and confirmed they they do not know what they are.

            They’re probably just trolling to anger others. Or truly ignorant of the confirmations.

            • @[email protected]English
              1•1 year ago

              I think a lot of the people that completely write the UAPs off as a hoax, or dismiss them as a mistake, are at least slightly scared by the implications of what these observations could mean.

              The UAPs seem to break our understanding of the laws of physics, and our military and intelligence communities seem to be genuinely stumped by them. Even if these craft are being controlled by an unknown government or group of humans, it is still terrifying that they managed to make such advancements while hiding them from the rest of the world.

              I have always been pretty skeptical. I won’t even try to begin to claim I know what these things are, or where they come from. Despite that, the evidence that they exist is getting pretty hard to deny.

              I just can’t think of another reason why so many people want to mock and avoid the topic, besides fear and angst. This could be one of the biggest discoveries or paradigm shifts of our entire history as a species, with or without aliens being involved.

                • @[email protected]English
                  1•1 year ago

                  I would bet on the same.

                  Btw, if you are the og Poem_for_your_sprog from reddit, I just want to say thanks for the beautiful poems. You always made the comment section better.

            • Cosmic ClericEnglish
              -1•1 year ago

              For the person who downvoted, what’s your reason why? I’m honestly curious.

    • @[email protected]English
      2•1 year ago

      200g *if * they are interpreting what they see correctly. A sensor artifact doesn’t need to respect any flight characteristics.

      Being experts in one field doesn’t make them experts in whatever may be causing the tic tac.