• @set_secret
    link
    51 year ago

    I don’t need to click on the article to know it’s at least a metric FUCK TONNE less than burning fossil fuel.

    • @doppelgangmember
      link
      51 year ago

      Regardless I always find the argument for fossil fuels over EV hilariously stupid when measuring carbon outputs. Considering that these renewable elements can be recycled over and over unlike one-time fossil fuels…

      • schmorp
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        No they can’t, or have they found a way to 100% recycle Lithium? As far as I know currently they are dependent of mining ever more Lithium to produce new batteries. Nobody really measures the damage done to the earth there, especially when mining happens in remote and/or poor areas.

        Even renewable energy needs mined minerals and regular replacement of parts - solar, hydro, wind. All energy has a cost.

        • @doppelgangmember
          link
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No one said it was a zero-sum game. Nothing really is (excluding theory). I’m just gonna leave these here for good news:

          The process, which has also been used on material left over from magnet manufacturing that typically goes to waste, can recover 90 to 98 percent of the rare earths, and the material is pure enough to make new magnets, Nlebedim’s team has demonstrated.

          Recovering up to 70 percent of lithium from battery waste without corrosive chemicals, high temperatures, and prior sorting of materials being required: This is achieved by a recycling method developed by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). Mar 30, 2023

          Also do we wanna start comparing fossil fuel extraction to metals extraction? It’s kind of a moot point. Especially when we have only about 50 years of accessible oil reserves anyway.