• Big P
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      If the bridge was no longer there why wasn’t there massive unmovable concrete barriers in the road?

      • @Arrakis
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        I was as baffled as you are, until I law the location it happened.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have read because it was a private road, they are legally not allowed to place an unmovable object

        • @SheeEttin
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          That doesn’t make sense. If it’s a private road, wouldn’t that mean you can place whatever you want on it? It’s your road.

          • Madison_rogue
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            The developer never turned over the road to the North Carolina DOT after completion of the subdivision.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Just depends on the “they”. Local government wouldn’t touch it, the owners could have. I’d say it’s a slam dunk case against the owners for exactly that reason. Google ignored numerous reports so they may get some blame too.