• Big P
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    If the bridge was no longer there why wasn’t there massive unmovable concrete barriers in the road?

    • @Arrakis
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      I was as baffled as you are, until I law the location it happened.

    • SSUPII
      link
      fedilink
      -4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have read because it was a private road, they are legally not allowed to place an unmovable object

      • @SheeEttin
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        That doesn’t make sense. If it’s a private road, wouldn’t that mean you can place whatever you want on it? It’s your road.

        • Madison_rogue
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          The developer never turned over the road to the North Carolina DOT after completion of the subdivision.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Just depends on the “they”. Local government wouldn’t touch it, the owners could have. I’d say it’s a slam dunk case against the owners for exactly that reason. Google ignored numerous reports so they may get some blame too.