• @BURN
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    That’s not my problem

    Art is not generated by machines. Nothing of value is lost.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Ah, so you meant “there’s not a single downside to me.”

      • @BURN
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        Nothing of value is lost. Generative AI does not create anything new.

        It’s exclusively a benefit to artists

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Nothing of value to you is lost. We already know you don’t care about other people, no need to keep repeating that.

          • @BURN
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            AI does not generate anything of value

            I care about artists and the protection of their work. Not the AI models or their creators.

            • FaceDeer
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              There are artists who use AI tools as part of their workflow. You don’t care about them.

              • @BURN
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                And they can allow their art to be used to train AI. It just shouldn’t come at the expense of everyone else who wants to do things the traditional way.

                Why should my work be open for anyone to use to train AI? I don’t care if it’s a hobbyist or an open model or google. I don’t want them using my work for training their models. Artists currently have rights over their work being used commercially, and I expect AI arguments to go that way as well. If it is to be used then it must be with the permission of the creator and a licensing contract written out. Art can be shared license free or AI permissive licenses, but would not be required to be.