Even China’s population of 1.4 billion would not be enough to fill all the empty apartments littered across the country, a former official said on Saturday, in a rare public critique of the country’s crisis-hit property market.

China’s property sector, once the pillar of the economy, has slumped since 2021 when real estate giant China Evergrande Group (3333.HK) defaulted on its debt obligations following a clampdown on new borrowing.

Big-name developers such as Country Garden Holdings (2007.HK) continue to teeter close to default even to this day, keeping home-buyer sentiment depressed.

As of the end of August, the combined floor area of unsold homes stood at 648 million square metres (7 billion square feet), the latest data from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) show.

That would be equal to 7.2 million homes, according to Reuters calculations, based on the average home size of 90 square metres.

  • Hyperreality
    link
    fedilink
    60
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The world is really lucky that China’s not doing that great at the moment. Not so long ago, China was winning the propaganda war internationally.

    You don’t want authoritarianism to win the argument by out-performing democracies.

    • JasSmith
      link
      fedilink
      311 year ago

      I agree. I don’t think we had or have anything to fear. The Chinese educational system is built around obedience, cultural homogeneity, and rote learning. Sure, there are fewer protests, and there is less crime, but also a SEVERE lack of innovation. I can count on one hand the number of innovations China has exported to the world in the last decade. Everything they build of note is based on stolen IP and figurative and literal slave labour. The world is finally clamping down on the former, and China’s social progression to a service-based economy is putting an end to the latter. Their comparative competitive advantages are eroding by the day.

      • Pelicanen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        and there is less crime

        I wouldn’t necessarily bet on this, authoritarian states are breeding grounds for corruption and that in turn fuels crime. I wouldn’t be surprised if China has a problem with criminality that the government, at least on a local level, not only turns a blind eye to but is complicit in.

    • @Astroturfed
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      They’ve hit the middle income trap while simultaneously upsetting all their trading partners. It’s not going to be a pretty fall from grace. Fake numbers saying how awesome things are only work for so long.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I suspect a major reason for Putin’s most recent crimes was to prevent his people learning how much their neighbours are prospering.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -141 year ago

      Why doesn’t China count as a democracy? People vote and the votes get counted and decide who runs things.

      • @kautau
        link
        English
        131 year ago

        Ah the old “ends justify the means” argument. I’ve seen this one before somewhere

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 year ago

            “the means” in this case would be authoritarian repression.

            “The means” always has to be something bad for the “ends” to try and justify reaching for “the means”.

          • Lemminary
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            Can you give a briefer on how it’s outperforming democracies? I don’t mean to be confrontational, I really want to hear why you think that.

            • Lols [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              i dont have a briefer on how its outperforming democracies, im not the one that came up with that premise

              • Lemminary
                link
                English
                21 year ago

                Wait, what? But you said:

                why dont we want that if its outperforming democracies

                “the means”, of course, being out-performing democracies

                I’m missing something here

                • Lols [they/them]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  hyperreality said

                  You don’t want authoritarianism to win the argument by out-performing democracies.

                  i argued based on that premise

                  you can tell because of the use of the word “if” in this sentence

                  why dont we want that >if< its outperforming democracies

                  if that premise was nonsense from the start they probably shouldnt have run an argument off it

                  • Lemminary
                    link
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    Ahh, right, thank you for clarifying. The way the thread is structured made it seem like you were the one claiming that even though you were bouncing off the other comment. I’ll need to be more careful.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Alright I’ll bite, what makes the world’s declared democracies actually undemocratic in your mind?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          241 year ago

          Billionaires directly or indirectly buying elections, politicians, drafting policies, funding propaganda, regulatory capture, etc.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I live in Denmark. All liberal democracies are subject to the whims of billionaires.

              Edit: oh wait, you’re Canadian. That’s fucking hilarious.

            • @kautau
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Sure, and I’ll agree that many places are actual democracies, but that doesn’t mean they’re free from corruption. You’re both sort of right. There are democracies that work. But none of them are without corruption.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                The corruption is baked into the system. I did not have anything illegal in mind when I wrote that list.

                There can be no democracy without economic democracy.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  There can be no democracy without economic democracy.

                  Economic democracies are even rarer than political ones, and I’m not aware of any actually complete one. Europe still gets you closest, especially Germany and Austria, with very strong co-determination laws, in Germany’s case reserving 50% - 1 board seats for the shop floor council – the workers don’t need much capital in that case to control the company.

                  And as far as I’m aware there’s not, and never has been, a single country that is not politically a democracy that would be an economic democracy. Certain people might be thinking of state capitalist countries in that context but those never liked worker control of anything, not unions, not shop floor councils, not nothing. They just dressed themselves in it. Ask, random example, Solidarność.

      • 小莱卡
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Its a democracy when you’re in the global north, it’s autocracy when you’re in the global south.

      • @hark
        link
        English
        -91 year ago

        I love how you’re getting downvoted, likely by people who feel a sense of enlightenment in that they can identify Chinese propaganda that has been pointed out to them as such but have no clue about propaganda originating from their own country or from a country theirs is allied with.

        • Lemminary
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          Why is propaganda always the go-to argument? Even if I identify US propaganda, it doesn’t make me more or less likely to hate it, which I don’t, even if I disapprove of some of their measures as much as I do of my own country. It’s such a baffling argument.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            Because most people are steeped in propaganda they don’t see.

            You say you don’t hate USA. You should. The US state is engaged in several ongoing genocides. Can you name them?

            • Lemminary
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              “You should” 😂 Sounds to me like you have an agenda and are spreading propaganda of your own. But please, enlighten me on those genocides with reliable sources.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                I have convictions that inform my opinions. I think it’s obvious that any decent person should hate USA, given their many, many crimes.

                I guess you could characterize all communication as propaganda, but that seems rather pointless.

                • Lemminary
                  link
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  It’s not pointless to say that when it’s clear that you want to drive public opinion by only emphasizing and exaggerating the bad without sources. It’s the literal definition of propaganda.

                  I still welcome that list of ongoing genocides with their credible sources.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    I’m not driving anything. I’m just a dude commenting on a public forum. You’re being very silly. 🙄

                    When did I volunteer to educate you? That you can’t answer, and seemingly think the very notion is ridiculous, is exactly the point.

          • @hark
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Scandinavia is a country?

              • @hark
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                You’ve generalized my post to completely omit the “or from a country theirs is allied with” so you can cut the smartass act.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              According to the Danes, definitely.

              Ironically, founded to “stop the encroachment by the Germans” the Kalmar union first had a Pommeranian King, and then a Saxon one.