• @30mag
    link
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      -51 year ago

      That doesn’t actually mean there are 65 million surplus properties. A vacant house isn’t an unnecessary house. Children move out all the time, families sometimes break up, Chinese citizens currently living overseas or in Europe return home, etc.

      I bet there’s actually math for this - I wonder if anyone has calculated the optimal amount of vacancies?

      • @30mag
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Sometimes, you misspeculate. Some developers lost a whole fuck ton of money on the project, but that’s more than made up for if you can turn a profit on projects near big cities (which demand is still sky high for).

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          -31 year ago

          I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials

          Is anyone? If I have to choose between “housing shortage” and “housing surplus” I know which society I would prefer.

          • @30mag
            link
            English
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              China isn’t really limited by construction resources. There’s a heavier constraint in terms of hospital staff and teachers than there is on construction resources.

              • @30mag
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator