• queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    -51 year ago

    That doesn’t actually mean there are 65 million surplus properties. A vacant house isn’t an unnecessary house. Children move out all the time, families sometimes break up, Chinese citizens currently living overseas or in Europe return home, etc.

    I bet there’s actually math for this - I wonder if anyone has calculated the optimal amount of vacancies?

    • @30mag
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Sometimes, you misspeculate. Some developers lost a whole fuck ton of money on the project, but that’s more than made up for if you can turn a profit on projects near big cities (which demand is still sky high for).

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        -31 year ago

        I still find it hard to believe that they are making the best use of labor and materials

        Is anyone? If I have to choose between “housing shortage” and “housing surplus” I know which society I would prefer.

        • @30mag
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            China isn’t really limited by construction resources. There’s a heavier constraint in terms of hospital staff and teachers than there is on construction resources.

            • @30mag
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator