• @RGB3x3
    link
    871 year ago

    In order to use a defibrillator, you have to remove everything from a person’s chest. This includes the bra and to even shave chest hair to be able to apply the pads correctly.

    I’ve always thought that it would be troublesome for a man to have to apply a defibrillator to a woman if someone assumes foul play because of their own issues.

    Life over dignity in that situation, everyone else be damned.

      • @Notorious_handholder
        link
        801 year ago

        You might not, but you gotta remember that the public is also filled with idiots

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 year ago

          While my cousin’s neighbor is fighting a law suit because, a woman (cousin’s neighbor) used defibrillator on another woman(when her heart stopped) , and other woman is now suing the neighbor for some minor marks from defibrillator. Mostly neighbor will win the case, but she has to appear in court now. Makes me feel so angry and i don’t even know the neighbor lady.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            381 year ago

            in these cases sometimes the insurance makes you sue even if you don’t want to because otherwise they won’t pay for any of the debt

            My colleague has a situation where he’s being sued by his neighbor for minor burns after a firework accident a few years ago 4th of July. The neighbor doesn’t want to sue him but has no choice to get the medical services paid for.

            • @Chreutz
              link
              141 year ago

              That is so ridiculous…

              • Captain Aggravated
                link
                fedilink
                241 year ago

                I wonder if judges could be persuaded to levy punitive damages against the insurance company for this kind of thing. “Your honor, we’re only wasting your time with this because the insurance company is making us sue. Could you confiscate a few hundred million dollars from them for this worthless harassment?”

                • @PickTheStick
                  link
                  121 year ago

                  At least in America, all the judges are either in the pocket of the businesses or have their hands tied by laws passed by legislators who are in the pocket of businesses. Fuck them businesses.

            • @GoofSchmoofer
              link
              131 year ago

              The ultimate goal with insurance companies is to have you give them money and they never have to give you anything in return. If they can get you to sue the other person, the insurance company doesn’t have to pay. To them it’s a win-win.

              Weakly regulated insurance is a scam

        • Chetzemoka
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          And you have to remember that there’s a difference between what some random idiot on the street thinks and what someone can actually be prosecuted for.

          Jesus Christ, do the fucking CPR

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The court of public opinion, and cancel culture, do not care about good Samaritan laws.

              News that destroys reputations can spread faster and further than the truth. Most people still think the McDonalds coffee lady is a gold digger after 20 years of corrections.

            • @PickTheStick
              link
              41 year ago

              There are, but remember that defenses come into play after being sued. So you can still go through the mental nightmare (because let’s be real, a rich person isn’t going to be doing CPR, and certainly isn’t going to care about being sued, so only your typical person who could lose everything in this scenario) of being a defendant in a lawsuit until the judge agrees to toss it or you go to court and are found not liable.

              • @Cringe2793
                link
                31 year ago

                The public scrutiny and the mark on your record does not go away even if you’re found not liable. Once you are even accused of anything like this, it’s there forever. People will think you got off on a “technicality”.

                If you’re a man facing this, your life is ruined. May as well move away and never come back.

          • @Notorious_handholder
            link
            11 year ago

            Never said I wouldn’t do the CPR. Only pointing out that in an emergency situation that people are fucking stupid and that a random idiot could easily interfere violently with what they think might be sexual assault

      • circuscritic
        link
        fedilink
        12
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which is why all the most clever rapists carry defibs.

        If you EVER see a man carrying a defibrillator, 9 of 10 times, he’s a rapist.

        What’s worse, the extra super clever ones, ride around in ambulances with disguises to make them look like paramedics.

        Whenever I see a rapist mobile with flashing lights, I run them off the road.

        I’ve saved at least a dozen women already this year.

        • @CADmonkey
          link
          71 year ago

          To be fair there are rapist mobiles and they do have flashing lights, they just don’t say “Ambulance” on them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I could imagine someone thinking “wow he took her bra off, that was unnecessary”. Since correct defib use isn’t really common knowledge

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      431 year ago

      Imagine dying because some old puritan assholes decided at some point that female nips are inherently offensive but male nips are fine. Humanity can be so idiotic sometimes

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        281 year ago

        Yeah that wouldn’t be what prevents a man from giving a woman CPR. It would be the potential for someone to cry foul play.

      • @NotSoCoolWhip
        link
        191 year ago

        No, they decided both were bad. It wasn’t until 1935 that male nips were legal to open-carry

    • @answersplease77
      link
      371 year ago

      It does not have to be life over dignity. There can be a middle ground they could at least provide a cover while doing their thing. I know a teen girl who changed school, did therapy and tried to sue because she once had a seizure and they stripped her naked in front everyone to save her. Her “friends” took video of her and spread it all over their school. As awful as it sounds I’m not making this up.

      • @Cringe2793
        link
        71 year ago

        Yup, and that’s exactly why men don’t help. They tried to save her, but got sued. It’s really not worth it.

        • Turun
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I’d expect the people who shared footage to be sued, not the first responders.

        • ANGRY_MAPLE
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Why does almost no one clear the area in these posted experiences? That was covered in my (very) basic first aid training. It was emphasized, and it came with a heavy reminder that patient care should be a very high priority. I’m honestly just suprised to read all of these.

          Y’all need better trainers and better Good Samaritan laws to protect you. What a world where someone just dies when they could have been saved by someone who was already nearby. Society sucks. Neither “angle” is great.

          • @Cringe2793
            link
            11 year ago

            Yup, society sucks. It’s probably selfish of me, but I ain’t saving someone when it’s possible that I get accused of SA. It’s just not worth it. The hassle and the possiblilty of being labelled could affect my future and jobs.

    • Clay_pidgin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I just did red cross CPR and AED training last week, and the materials said the clothes all need to come off (or pulled up or whatever - off the chest) but chest hair doesn’t need to be shaved. Presumably the instructions change periodically.

      • @cybersandwich
        link
        231 year ago

        Its probably much better to have a shaved chest, but lets be realistic. In a situation where CPR and an AED are being used, 1. you probably arent going to have a razor handy 2. the sub-optimal contact with the skin is the least of you (or the patient’s) worries.

          • kilodelta
            link
            101 year ago

            Can confirm. Almost all defibrillators come with a pack of additional supplies - including a dry razor

            • @HewlandRower
              link
              81 year ago

              They also teach now to use the provided additional set of pads to basically wax the chest.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’s only an issue on very hairy chests – i.e. full “bearskin rug” where you need to place the pads. There are patients that have so much hair the pads aren’t even touching skin.

          In which case you absolutely need to remove the hair. A slightly delayed initial defibrillation is better than multiple ineffective ones. Most AED kits should have a spare set of pads (“wax the chest” with the first set) or a disposable razor.

      • @TommySalami
        link
        121 year ago

        You’re not going to take time to shave, every second counts. The solution is the extra adhesive pads most every AED has. You plant one of those on the the chest hair and rip, and you can get an effectively hairless spot for your lead.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Dry shaving a hairy spot takes like 5 seconds. We’re not talking about whipping out a hot towel and a straight razor.

      • @PickTheStick
        link
        71 year ago

        The instructions say that chest hair comes off if the pad isn’t sticking effectively to the chest. That means shaving if you have a razor, or using the second adhesives (kid/adult sizes usually come in the same AED kit) as ad hoc waxing devices.

        • @Cringe2793
          link
          51 year ago

          Because you could get accused of SA.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Not realistically, no. Good Samaritan laws exist, and if you do CPR properly there’s a 0% chance that it wouldn’t be clearly obvious.

            When you do CPR right, you will break ribs off the sternum (unless it’s a child).

            • @Cringe2793
              link
              01 year ago

              If you really think there’s a 0% chance then you’re either delusional or willfully ignorant.

      • @ReluctantMuskrat
        link
        21 year ago

        And that random person may someday be your daughter, and the bystanders some other men who agree with you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Doubtful. I recognize the world is a shitty place so I had a surgery to prevent me from bringing more people into it.

          To be clear, because somehow this was lost in translation, I wish it was as cut and dry as giving CPR to someone who needs it. But the world, again, is a shitty place.

    • @jpreston2005
      link
      31 year ago

      you dont have to shave chest hair, wtf are you talking about?

      • @Okokimup
        link
        161 year ago

        You don’t have to, but some defibrillator kits include a razor, and when I took a CPR class, we were taught how to remove hair using either a razor or an extra set of defib pads.

      • @shortly2139
        link
        51 year ago

        They’re constantly updating best practices, the kits come with a little razor now. Though we got told to apply the pad on the hair and then pull it off, effectively waxing the area. It’s apparently to get better contact. Personally I think shaving would be more effective, suppose you do what you have to in the situation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Waxing would be faster and if there’s still hair you could shave it. More painful of course but if it wakes them up you can stop there.