• @thisNotMyName
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    What’s wrong with good 'ol reliable Fritzbox? Never had a single problem with one and get’s the job done

    • @mholiv
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Newer models have fewer and fewer ways to configure them.

    • KptnAutismus
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      don’t like them. the two i ever used had regular crashes and wifi-outages. not to mention the laughable range. i’m cool with people using them, i would just never buy one.

      • @mholiv
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        100% this. People are ok with them because it’s all they know. Once you use higher quality networking equipment it’s painful to go back.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            network segregation. setting up vnets and rulesets for guests, iot or dmz and deploy them site-wide to all switches.

            • Nightwatch Admin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              If you want or need that, you shouldn’t be looking at consumer products. I can configure wifi, ethernet and guest wlan and an additional set of public ipv4s , which is more than enough for end users. Anything more and it becomes too hard to manage and understand, and results in insecure setups. I built infrastructure for a living and I find Fritzes more than good enough for residential connections and they work extremely well, 7581 excepted, those were godawful crap.

              • @mholiv
                link
                English
                41 year ago

                We just don’t want to be limited to fritz. You might be ok with the limited options but many are not. We should not allow the fiber exception here.

                • Nightwatch Admin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -11 year ago

                  You should definitely not go along with that fiber exception, I have a gigabit fiber connection where I can hook up basically anything that adheres to standards and regulations, and my ISP has been a strong proponent of that too.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What’s your point exactly? Besides telling me I shouldn’t use AVM hardware?

                I’m not using AVM products, as they don’t fit my requirements (e.g. network segregation). Ubiquiti makes decent prosumer hardware with their Unifi line and I’m quite happy with their offerings.

                An AVM user asked for potential use cases that FritzBoxes aren’t covering and I provided one.

          • @mholiv
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago
            1. Your range is much lower than it should be.

            2. If multiple people use the Wi-Fi at the same time the speed is lower than it should be compared to taking your total speed and dividing by users.

            3. You are missing access to some settings that you should have access to. On newer Fritzboxes you can’t even set port forwarding at all.

            • Nightwatch Admin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 year ago

              Excuse me but this a load of. Range is just fine, as is speed -unless you’re using a 7581 vDSL model, those were crash-prone and wifi broke often. I have and had several models and that was the only one ever causing trouble. And port forwarding is still there,at least on a 7990 with the latest firmware update.

              • @mholiv
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                If you are happy with the range stick with it. 🤷‍♀️

                As for port forwarding it was not an option with the fritzbox provided by vodaphone to me. Maybe because it was DS-Lite stack only.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  61 year ago

                  No that’s because vodafone puts their own firmware version on it with limited settings. If you get the same fritzbox with the default firmware from AVM then you have port forwarding.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I had a router from 1&1 where they locked down the firmware to exclude many settings. Might be a similar case with Vodafone.

                • Nightwatch Admin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  You said “range is much lower than it should be”, I’ve never heard that before, except - again - only for the 7581. Fritzes are generally tested as medium to good range, and very stable, so it is not just me. Are you maybe using APs with excessive transmit power settings or something similar?

                  • @mholiv
                    link
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    Using APs with excessive transmit power does not really extend range. The client radio can only respond with such a signal.

                    I use APs with proper MIMO and proper beam forming. Doing so allows for less time slicing between clients and allows for greater distance and speed per client. Take a look at the RUCKUS R560 or it’s more advanced siblings if you are interested. Even ubiquity equipment like the U6 has a proper MIMO implementation that Fritz does not.

                    If people are happy with Fritz that is ok. But it’s lower range, with lower capacity, and with fewer features than many people would like. We should not be limited to consumer level Fritz products on fiber.