In an impassioned and at times furious speech, departing Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley defiantly proclaimed that the US military does not swear an oath to a “wannabe dictator.”

It was a bitter and pointed swipe that appeared unmistakably targeted at former President Donald Trump, who has in recent days accused Milley of “treason” and suggested that he should be put to death for his conduct surrounding Trump’s bid in 2021 to remain in office despite losing the presidential election.

“We are unique among the world’s militaries,” Milley said. “We don’t take an oath to a country, we don’t take an oath to a tribe, we don’t take an oath to a religion. We don’t take an oath to a king, or a queen, or a tyrant or a dictator.”

    • downpunxx
      link
      fedilink
      661 year ago

      They swear an oath to uphold The Constitution of the United States of America

    • @fuzz00713
      link
      43
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Constitution…

      United States Army Oath of Enlistment

      “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God”

      • @auraness
        link
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is the oath of enlistment, not the oath commissioned officers take. Officers only swear to uphold the Constitution.

        • @fuzz00713
          link
          191 year ago

          United States Army Oath of Commissioned Officers

          “I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God”

          Only difference is no promise to follow the presidents orders.

      • and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me

        They may not swear an oath to him, but they do swear to follow his orders.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          41
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          … according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

          That last bit negates any requirement to obey unlawful orders.

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            True, they still have to uphold the constitution; but if a tyrannical government changes it or interprets it differently, then it isn’t necessarily unlawful or against the constitution to follow a tyrannical order. And that’s scary.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              171 year ago

              That’s a pretty stupid tautology. “If they change the law, it’s not illegal.” And?

              There are no laws that can’t be changed. That’s why you need to vote in all elections.

        • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
          link
          171 year ago

          …according to regulations and the UCMJ

          You missed that part. If the POTUS orders them to do something against regulations (and against the constitution) then they have a duty to refuse those orders.

          • @Weirdfish
            link
            31 year ago

            They really hammered this home in basic. I remember being really suprised by it, having thought as an airman basic I had to do anything I was ordered without question.

            Now, the truth is, for your everyday enlisted person, the chances of being given an actually illegal order is basically 0.

            Still, it was nice to know that there are mechanisms is place to protect me if I was told to do something truly horrible.

            • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
              link
              31 year ago

              Yeah, watching Nazis get prosecuted after World War 2 was a good wake-up call. The armed forces realized that “I was just following orders” wasn’t a viable defense, and they really started pushing the fact that service members had a duty to refuse obviously illegal orders.

        • @just_change_it
          link
          161 year ago

          Does no one remember Captain John Sheridan?

          Do not follow illegal orders.

          • @fox2263
            link
            31 year ago

            There’s are YOUR sons, YOUR daughters! And they have come home.

          • Cosmic Cleric
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            I think about the overall “President Clark” scenario a lot more these days, after the last former president.

        • @fuzz00713
          link
          121 year ago

          That is true. The President also swears to uphold and defend the constitution. Ordinarily that isn’t a problem.
          Sadly in Milleys case it was a problem and he was left in a a largly untenable position.

        • kirklennon
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Just to add, officers take a different oath that doesn’t include the obeying orders line:

          I ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          You say that like they swear specifically to obey Trump’s orders. Not their fault who was voted into office.

        • @auraness
          link
          51 year ago

          Not in the oath for Officers.

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      101 year ago

      The swear an oath to uphold the constitution. It’s a relatively minor difference between swearing to a country. Basically, soldiers have a duty to refuse orders that they know to be illegal, even if those orders are coming from the POTUS. So if the POTUS tries to order all of the generals to DSP something against the constitution, they have a duty to refuse; Because they haven’t sworn an oath to the POTUS; They’ve sworn an oath to the constitution.

    • @suodrazah
      link
      71 year ago

      If you read past the heading, you might find out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        Ya know, fair. I offered the same suggestion to someone on another post just the other day.

        That being said, providing summaries that stop one sentence short of relevant information to turn them into clickbait, not that helpful.

      • htrayl
        link
        51 year ago

        Understanding the relationship of the US military to the US government is essential civics knowledge. Like understanding the 3 branches of government

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Lol, no it isn’t. It’s some extremely niche shit that 90% of people know very little about.

      • Lightor
        link
        41 year ago

        Because the answer is in the article.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Okay, but the video cuts off just before the answer and the page is formatted to draw attention away from the article.