• @marx2k
    link
    English
    51 year ago

    Linux does have desktop environments.

      • @brakebreaker101
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        That’s a lot like how on windows you have to download a zip and open it to select an executable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I think it depends on what you’re trying to do. Normal stuff like web browsing, email and working with documents is fine. For example, my partner has been running her business from a Linux laptop for the last year or so and I don’t think she ever touches the terminal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not that it’s unintuitive at all if you pick a simple distro, it’s just slightly different from Windows which has been shoved in your face throughout your entire education and career.

        Yes there is some small amount of learning involved, but there are many Linux distros nowadays that are setup for ease of use and require no CLI knowledge or use from the user. There are many desktop environments that mimic Windows versions to make the switch pretty seamless, too.

        If you first tried Linux many years ago, I could understand you saying that it’s unintuitive, but nowadays that just isn’t the case.

        I’d like to add that you should just pick the OS you prefer. I’m not one of those needs that look down on anyone who chooses to use Windows over Linux. I personally have both on my machine because games. I just wanted to clarify that it isn’t unintuitive at all, just different than what you were forced to learn in school.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You don’t have to really use the CLI on the simpler Linux distros nowadays is what I am getting at. Mint and Ubuntu for instance. My grandparents use Mint, and believe me, they don’t know what the terminal is.

            Also, windows installers run Command Prompt stuff in the background. You are basically doing the same process but clicking buttons to setup a CLI command. They are more similar than you think.

            You are just used to the GUI way of doing things, and you can get by fine on Linux nowadays. If you were forced to learn Linux growing up, you would think Windows was the unintuitive OS.

            I’m not trying to convince you one is better than the other, just telling you that it is not unintuitive.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                6
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No you don’t have to use the CLI on Linux at all You are just wrong about that. Modern Mint and Ubuntu come with completely GUI driven package managers for installing and updating. It hasn’t always been like this but it is now.

                The only reason you would have to use the CLI is if you are doing some power user stuff that you would have to do on CLI or powershell in windows, as well.

                You do realize this is just your opinion and not a fact. Your opinion is that is unintuitive. My opinion is that it is not, its literally impossible to be wrong here. I can find tons of people who think Windows way of doing things is more unintuitive. The only fact here is that neither of them actually are unintuitive in reality. People just have preferences and biases because of what they are used to.

                You sound awfully close minded and angry for some reason too.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    Okay and…what about the cornucopia of software that is not available in those repositories?

                    Sort by approximate number of pre-compiled packages. AppImage etc. are on top of that.

                    You have to hunt for software on windows way more than on Linux. And it also doesn’t always have a CLI installer: Say you want to control a Huawei E3372 not via its web interface (which sucks). Where do you go? You find a project on github, install go via chocolatey, then compile the project, then drop the exe somewhere.

                    Linux, at least, does not fucking de-install the graphics drivers while I’m playing a game. The level of jank on Linux is high, yes, with Windows it’s incomprehensibly high.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    Okay fair points. Like I said earlier. I am not knocking your choice of windows or anything, I am just trying to add that I have had the opposite experience with noob users on Mint, especially. There is not a single application that I could think of that noob users would want to use that aren’t in the included repositories to begin with. I just don’t want people to be scared away from trying Linux just because they are unexperienced.

                    I feel like you may be a step above your average noob and can figure out how to do some advanced things on windows, but you just don’t want to put in the time to relearn what you already know. That’s completely fair.