• @luckyhunter
    link
    -11 year ago

    Oh it absolutely changes. US politicians need to determine what’s best for the US. And recently that has been to stop funding aid to Ukraine for atleast the next month, and to now enter into a new house speaker voting battle which could take weeks resolve. And those “calls for peace” have been symbolic “please don’t invade, go home”. There’s been no serious peace negotiations, I don’t even think there’s been much push from anyone for negotiations. If it’s in the US’s best interest to continue to harm Russia, then the trickle of aid will resume, but like I said originally I personally think that mission has been accomplished, and we can be done with it and I’m in the majority.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Again, the funding for Ukraine continues. In reality yhere is no disturbance there.

      Again, calls for peace are in almost every public speech of almost every world leader, so I have no idea what the hell you are taking about. But I’ve seen this taking point coming from the kremlin when they are trying to self victimise.

      I have no idea what mission you think America has accomplished. The war will last for some time and America has signed contracts to deliver weapons for at least the next two years. Multi year contacts have been signed with many other countries. The weapon deliveries have barely just begun. You being in majority is a big streatch after one cnn poll. What currently matters is that congress is voting 3:1 in favour of continuous help. It’s unlikely that will change in the near future and even if it did, many contracts are already signed.

      And again, the idea that they would limit aid to prolong the conflict is completely illogical.

      • @luckyhunter
        link
        11 year ago

        Ok, who organized and hosted the most recent peace talks between Ukraine and Russia? what terms were discussed?

        Oh it’s completely logical. We’ve done it to Russia basically in every single one of their conflicts since the start of the cold war.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          There can’t be any meaningful peacetalks when one side actively occupies another country and claims it wants even more territory. Of course the only “peace talks” they would listen to are from the only country that hasnt completely cut them off which is China. And china has its own interests in this. Peace is easy. The only thing that needs to happen is that Russia removes their army from Ukraine borders. The borders they have recognized and signed dozens of international resolutions to that effect for the last 30 years.

          Your statement is completely illogical and because of that it has never been done in such a way. It might work against a smaller country where there wouldn’t be any other involved party. Especially not the size of EU. Not even then. You are repeating Russian propagandist talking points. Why? Are you aligned with them? If not, doesn’t it concern you that you are using exactly the same language?

          • @luckyhunter
            link
            11 year ago

            I didn’t realize Russia was advocating to save me money but thats cool. No it doesn’t concern me at all because claiming “Russian propoganda” doesn’t change anything I’ve said.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              It doesn’t bother you at all that you are using the exact talking points, that Russian propagandist are using?

              I mean surely you at leat wonder a bit why that is?

              • @luckyhunter
                link
                01 year ago

                nope. It’s interesting they are worried about how my tax money is spent and not the war, that explains the massive failure their invasion has been i guess.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  That is interesting isn’t it, how you agree with them? I wonder why that is. It couldn’t possibly be because of the source of your information. A smart man like you, you probably carefully digest information for a wide variety of sources, not just a single opinion talking head.

                  Interesting.

                  • @luckyhunter
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    True. I’m not insane thinking that the US will give half their military budget to defend a country that doesn’t matter.