Story Highlights

  • Third time support has exceeded 60%, along with 2017 and 2021
  • Republicans primarily behind the increase, with 58% now in favor
  • Political independents remain group most likely to favor third party
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -61 year ago

    stein wasn’t a spoiler. the whole narrative of spoiler candidates presumes that republicans or democrats own votes but they don’t. voters own votes, and tehy get to decide who they want to give them to. it’s not as though democrats don’t know what it is that green party voters want, they just don’t care if they get green party voters to switch.

    • phillaholic
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Reality is, if you vote green you’re giving Republicans +1. You either know your candidate won’t win, or aren’t smart enough to understand probability. Regardless the outcome is the same no matter what excuse you give.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Reality is, if you vote green you’re giving Republicans +1.

        Eh…

        Lots of people who voted 3rd party wouldn’t vote for either of the top 2 parties.

        I 100% agree it’s the same as not voting for that race. But I wouldn’t go as far as to say it’s essentially a vote for a party.

          • @givesomefucks
            link
            English
            51 year ago

            other side.

            That’s what I’m talking about…

            Roughly a third of eligible voters don’t identify as either party.

            Most of them rarely vote, a few vote third party. You could argue both groups aren’t voting, but you can’t pretend they’d all vote D instead. They’d probably just not vote.

            • phillaholic
              link
              fedilink
              -21 year ago

              Anyone who is undecided at this time is either extremely naive or doesn’t want to publicly admit their real position for some reason. These sides are basically authoritarian fascism only concerned with rich people getting richer and everyone else. We don’t debate policy anymore. The right has none. They fabricate a bunch of bullshit to keep people angry and then grift grift grift every chance they get.

              If you’re not in the “everyone else” camp, stop here.

              Otherwise, if you are, none of us are going to get everything we want. Let’s get that out there right now. If you are with a group of friends deciding on where to go to dinner, you compromise. You don’t sit there and refuse and just starve. That’s life. Make your case for the choice you want. If you don’t have the support, work to find your next best choice. Don’t sit there and do nothing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        You either know your candidate won’t win, or aren’t smart enough to understand probability

        false dichotomy

        • phillaholic
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Only Symbolically. In reality your splitting the vote among broadest like minded individuals which gives the advantage to the opposition. You don’t have to like it, but that’s the consequence.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In reality your splitting the vote

            if others were like-minded they’d be voting for my candidate. if they’re concerned about vote splitting, they should vote with the people they know will not compromise and vote for someone THEY don’t want to win.

            You don’t have to like it

            • phillaholic
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Yes, 99% of voters should conform to you. Not the other way around.

                • phillaholic
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -21 year ago

                  Depends on the election. I’m not asking you to do anything. I’m telling you you’re helping accomplish the opposite of what you want versus something close to what you want.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    31 year ago

                    I’m telling you you’re helping accomplish the opposite of what you want

                    impossible: what i want is for fascist to get out of office, not for a less-fascist politician to win. that’s why i’m planning to vote green again.

      • @goldenlocks
        link
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        False. It’s like youre ignoring the post article. 63% is more than enough to start voting third party

        • @assassin_aragorn
          link
          01 year ago

          I want several more parties, in a parliamentary system. But as long as we have FPTP I’m voting Dem until I die the way things are going

        • phillaholic
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          63% of people say they want another option, not 63% of people want the same other option. At best you could have the Republican Party split, but they know that means losing everywhere so they won’t actually do it.

          • @goldenlocks
            link
            11 year ago

            The Libertarian party splits the Republican party far more than the greens split the Dems. We need to promote more parties so they split the vote of both parties.

    • JDPoZ
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        pretending that Stein’s campaign didn’t effectively act the way a “spoiler” candidate’s campaign would - given that we don’t have something like “ranked choice” voting for the presidential eleciton - is demonstrably false.

        it’s definitively NOT demonstrably false: you can’t prove a counterfactual, so you can’t prove what would have happened if stein wasn’t on the ballot.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        And in at least a couple of swing states, her vote count was larger than Trump’s victory margin

        so what? hilary garnered more votes than trumps margin of victory over stein. was hilary a spoiler?

        if trump pulled more registered democrat votes in those states, would he be his own spoiler?

        where does it end?

        even raising the russophobic smear campaign in any way other than to condemn it is fucking gross.

        • JDPoZ
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I’m pretty skeptical about just the fact that Stein was there… like at the event.

            it was the RT 10th anniversary dinner, and RT is a major news outlet who has let her spread her message. it’s no more complicated than that.

            • @assassin_aragorn
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              RT also is the mouthpiece of the Putin administration and openly suggests drowning Ukrainian children.

              Edit: I retract these claims, RT severed ties with that individual.

            • JDPoZ
              link
              English
              -11 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                these are just smears and false equivalencies.

                what I said was true. you don’t have to like it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            she didn’t know he’d be there. she didn’t make the seating arrangements. all the insinuation is fucking gross and you should apologize to her.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Obama being photographed as the PRESIDENT at any number of the events set with Putin there in attendance is not the same

            no, it’s worse: from the seat of the presidency he legitimized putin. all stein did is buy a ticket to a dinner and get stuck with a shitty tablemate.

            • JDPoZ
              link
              English
              -11 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                so? is Putin a fascist plutocrat or a dignitary due respect from the POTUS?

                don’t suck Putin’s dick just because it has some of Obama’s spit on it.