• Piramic
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I used to work for a retail chain many years ago and I do not think this is true for everywhere.

        When we were asking for donations it was tracked and if our location didn’t get enough donations our store manager would get talked to by his district manager. I don’t know exactly what happened to the money once it was donated, but I don’t think they would have been so adamant about getting the donations if they didn’t make anything from it.

        This was like 20 years ago though, maybe its different now.

        • Rekorse
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah unfortunately the time and place it happened can change the legalities tremendously, but in general right now it appears that at least the type mentioned in the OP is in fact a donation from the customer directly to the charity. The business who is acting as a middleman will not have the donation affect their books, and the customer can keep these receipts so they can claim the donation on their own taxes.

          Even if you don’t itemize your deductions, you can still claim up to 300$ in donations.
          Edit: Apparently this was a temporary thing with the CARES act for 2020 and 2021 and is no longer active.

      • @Smoogs
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        does not get any benefit

        I’d say free PR is still a benefit. A bullshitter’s benefit

      • @axtualdave
        link
        English
        131 year ago

        It depends on exactly what the store is doing.

        If the store is representing the extra charge as a donation to a specific charity, generally, the customer can deduct that.

        If it’s far more vague, like, “Give $10 to help poor kids in Africa” the ultimate destination for the funds could be the company’s own ledgers, which it would then use for its own charitable activities and collect the tax deduction, as long as they “help poor kids in Africa.”

        And some stores are just lying. CVS, for instance, was sued as part of a class action suit when, after the company pledges $10 million to the American Diabetes Association, then collected money from customers to fund that pledge.

        • Emi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Yep, found the case you referred to…

          • Emi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            FACTS

            1. From November 2, 2021, through November 27, 2021, CVS conducted a campaign (the “Campaign”) in which, prior to the completion of transactions at its nearly ten thousand stores in the 50 States and the District of Columbia, customers were asked on the checkout screen if they wished, as part of the checkout process, to make a donation, above and beyond the price of their purchase, to the American Diabetes Association (“ADA”).
            1. The only term of the Campaign that CVS provided to customers was a representation on the checkout screen that the customer could make a donation to the ADA (a “Campaign Donation”) by tapping one of several boxes on the checkout screen, each of which contained a preselected amount, or that the customer could tap a box stating “no” with respect to making a Campaign Donation (the “Checkout Message”).
            1. The Checkout Message represented that CVS was merely collecting Campaign Donations and forwarding them to the ADA.
            1. The Checkout Message was a material element of the Campaign.
            1. CVS intended that customers would rely upon the Checkout Message in deciding whether to make a Campaign Donation.
            1. Customers had no reason to believe that the Checkout Message was anything but true and accurate.
            1. CVS did not merely collect customers’ Campaign Donations and forward them to the ADA, but, instead, counted Campaign Donations toward the satisfaction of a legally binding obligation, which CVS had made to the ADA, to donate $10 million to the ADA during the threeyear period of 2021 through 2023 (the “CVS Obligation”).
            1. CVS necessarily used Campaign Donations to reimburse itself, or pay down its debt, with respect to the CVS Obligation. 2 Case 1:22-cv-03116-RPK-RML Document 1 Filed 05/26/22 Page 2 of 26 PageID #: 2
            1. CVS’s treatment of, and benefit from, Campaign Donations were materially different than the false, deceptive, and misleading representation that CVS had given to its customers, which was that CVS was merely collecting Campaign Donations and forwarding them to the ADA.
            1. On or about November 15, 2021, McCabe made a Campaign Donation at the CVS store located at 1933 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island, New York 10314.