• Sentrovasi
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What exactly is being “supported”?

    To put it into perspective, I can claim to be a “critical supporter” of the effort to repel Russia’s attack on Ukraine, except that unlike people who claim to “critically support” the other side, I’m not claiming to “support” the aggressive oppression of a sovereign country at all.

    As such, ostensibly “critical support” for something must mean that you’d rather this shit happen than not. You can’t claim “emphasis on the critical” as though that absolves you of that burden. If you were really more critical than supporting then you’d be “critically supporting” the other side.

      • @trashgirlfriend
        link
        201 year ago

        Critical support for the fascist regime because there was a group of a couple nazis in Ukraine

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Endless civilian bombings, rape and torture of Ukrainians by invading Russians?

          “I heard they were just fighting nazis, bro. I’m just coincidentally ignorant about a horrifying war that’s been all over the news for years.”

          • PugJesus
            link
            fedilink
            171 year ago

            “I’m just asking questions! Isn’t Germany just invading Poland to protect minorities? That’s what I heard! It’s not my claim, I’m just spreading it around!”

            • @Aceticon
              link
              41 year ago

              “Surelly we should hear both sides of the argument!”

      • Sentrovasi
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think it’s even more abhorrent to claim to “critically support” something while being ignorant, as you claim to be, of what you’re supporting. In what world does ignorance and being critical go hand in hand?

        Saying you’re a critical supporter, then backpedaling to say you’re just asking questions, either suggests wilful ignorance, which is the worst kind of disingenuity, or plain laziness in endorsing things you don’t care enough to know about, which in the age of internet-fuelled extremism is arguably worse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          151 year ago

          The old tankie dilemma - are they assholes or just incredibly stupid?

          Trick question, it’s usually both.

        • ComradeSharkfucker
          link
          fedilink
          -81 year ago

          I really didn’t claim any support, as I mentioned to someone else it was a “they say this”, “no, it is more accurate to say they say this” situation

          • Sentrovasi
            link
            fedilink
            101 year ago

            You’re trying to characterise it as such now, but saying “emphasis on the critical” - that’s your input suggesting that this support had merit. Hardly just saying it’s a different terminology. You’re backpedalling again.

            Regardless, a lot of people have chimed in explaining to you exactly why this is so damaging and how little merit your qualification has. If you’re as uneducated on the whole situation as you seem to be, why are you so unwilling to accept that it’s probably wrong?

            • ComradeSharkfucker
              link
              fedilink
              -12
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The emphasis on critical was meant to suggest hesitatancy or the acknowledgment of nuance to their actions not necessarily my personal beliefs. I do however believe that NATO had a lot to do with the start of this was as I’ve quite recently discovered since the beginning of this thread.

              As for my argumentative nature, I don’t like when my words are misinterpreted and used to claim things I did not say so it made me instinctually hostile. I also have trouble just letting things rest or ignoring situations. Anyway I’m working on educating myself I just think strawmans are dumb