• @bowcollector
        link
        English
        321 year ago

        so that justifies the bombing of civillians?

          • @SkyezOpen
            link
            English
            211 year ago

            Both sides are terrorists, yes. Glad we could agree on this.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                141 year ago

                I’ll answer that.

                No it is not justified.

                Can I understand why Hamas would want to do this, sure , because I have empathy by the bucket load and can understand that having your land taken from you over decades and nothing changes could leave them to believe they have no choice.

                Is it still wrong? It sure is.

                Does that give Israel the right to use white phosphorus on the most densely populated place on Earth? I think not. What do you think?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -14
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Thans for at least an answer.

                  Oh, you asked me a question…

                  So I haven’t checked the whole story on the Willy Pete. I can’t conceive of a reason to use it, frankly. The reason the US used it in Fallujah, Mosul, and Raqqa was to clear canopies sometimes put over the streets in that part of the world. I wouldn’t think it’s anymore terrifying than airplanes dropping JDAM and such. I’ll take a look.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    61 year ago

                    I don’t know why my comment is not showing, nor your reply (only shows as a reply in my inbox but not on the post). You didn’t answer my question?

      • norbert
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Idk, if someone came and took over my house and told me to fuck off I’d probably be pretty pissed about it for awhile.

          • norbert
            link
            fedilink
            16
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I graduated a long ass time ago I don’t respond to “answer my question first!” when I make a statement.

            One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. I would respond very poorly to someone coming and taking my home, even 50 years later.

            So, how would you respond to the same situation?

              • norbert
                link
                fedilink
                101 year ago

                I answered yours, now answer mine.

                How would you respond if someone showed up at your home and said “oh this is mine now” and took it?

      • @Squizzy
        link
        English
        121 year ago

        Tries historical rhetoric and fails so falls back on last week’s tragedy. No one is defending the civilians murders by Hamas, Israel created modern Hamas.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -141 year ago

          Let me help you with the answer to my question. Nothing justifies terror acts that Hamas did. NOTHING

            • @Squizzy
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              Unrelated to the Palestine situation, when I meet these argumentative losers on lemmy and block and report. I want to keep this place from becoming a cesspool and I recommend you do the same.