CEO Bobby Kotick will leave Activision Blizzard on January 1, 2024 | Schreier: Kotick will depart after 33 years, employees are “very excited.”::Schreier: Kotick will depart after 33 years, employees are “very excited.”

  • Ab_intra
    link
    English
    1071 year ago

    Hope he burn in hell. He’s the best example of how not to run a company. It’s insane that he’s not been let go for years now.

      • Ab_intra
        link
        English
        351 year ago

        I think you’re right. I’m pointing moee to his leadership and how he has allowed sexism and other bad behavior to go on without any consequences. He even told an assistant that he would have her killed… https://www.pcgamer.com/more-shocking-activision-blizzard-revelations-bobby-kotick-once-told-an-assistant-he-was-going-to-have-her-killed/

        He might earn himself and the stockholders a lot of money… But in my eyes he’s a great example of why I don’t like capitalism, but that is another discussion tho!

        • @Mudface
          link
          English
          251 year ago

          He’s obviously a terrible human being, I think you have to be to be a wildly successful CEO.

          But those are the people who are best at running companies. I wouldn’t be good at it, because I’m not a piece of shit

          • Ab_intra
            link
            English
            11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s what sucks about capitalism. We’re allowing thhattype of trash to run it.

            Wow I’m very anti capitalist today!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The thing that sucks even more about it is no one even has to ‘allow’ that type of trash to run it, it’s just what tends to happen if the profit motive is the main driver of people’s behavior.

            • @Mudface
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        ATVI’s stock performance only looks impressive if you don’t compare it to anything. Here’s a graph comparing ATVI to ONEQ, which is an ETF that tracks the NASDAQ composite index. If anything, ATVI has been slightly underperforming the market average for most of Kotick’s tenure as CEO.

        To see what “outperforming the market” looks like, compare ATVI to NVDA. NVDA’s stock has increased 16,000% in the 15 years that Kotick has been CEO of ATVI.

        Or to see some video game company stocks that have outperformed the market, compare ATVI to TTWO (Take Two) or CCOEY (Capcom).

        From a purely financial perspective, Kotick was middling at best. He deserves no plaudits. There were plenty of other NASDAQ companies that outperformed the market during the time he was CEO of ActiBlizz, including other video game companies.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Take two is three times smaller via market cap and Capcom is 8 times smaller, just saying looking at stock price alone doesn’t tell the full picture.

          Activision has also done multiple stock splits over the last 30 years.

          • @ManOMorphos
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Stock price charts account for all splits/reverse splits, so it wouldn’t be a factor when comparing price over time.

            I agree with the first point though. Even just performing slightly below the market with such a massive company would make Kotick very desireable as a new CEO, unfortunately. Maybe some corps would not be fine with his reputation, but I doubt he will struggle to find a position in a new board room.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              The stock price itself does account for it in the charts, but it doesn’t speak to the market cap aspect.

              • @QuaternionsRock
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                The charts are in percent, not dollars. It doesn’t matter that Capcom is 8 times smaller if investing $1 in it still yields a higher return on investment.

                Also, Take Two may be smaller, but… Grand Theft Auto.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Not true, because of stock splits

                  Also all I’m looking at is market cap, it doesn’t matter what games you like from them lol

                  • @QuaternionsRock
                    link
                    English
                    11 year ago
                    1. That’s not how stock splits are documented. The historical price per share is retroactively divided. Otherwise you’d see the share price suddenly drop by 50%…
                    2. Market cap by itself is not an indicator of performance. If I invest $1 billion in a company and it’s worth $1.1 billion 10 years later, is that a better or worse return than investing $1 million in a company that’s worth $2 million 10 years later?
                    3. I’m not a particularly big fan of GTA. I mentioned it because it’s the most profitable entertainment product ever created.
        • @Copernican
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          When is ONEQ a baseline to track against? Compare it to S&P500 and ATVI looks ahead.

        • @psycho_driver
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          I tried to get my parents to buy NVDA during its IPO.

      • Erian
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Most consumers just don’t care or don’t know at all who Bobby Kotick is. Call of Duty is so popular, but the people that follow the market or the game industry well enough to know the people behind games aren’t that many.