• @Everythingispenguins
    link
    15911 months ago

    Well the article does say

    “A judge agreed that she will serve about six years of probation, have to pay $2,700 in restitution and have to testify truthfully against her co-defendants.”

    So yes

    • @Jackcooper
      link
      6411 months ago

      $2700 for a lawyer lol, these numbers are so random

      • @Everythingispenguins
        link
        63
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah but she was Trump’s lawyer so I assume she is broke and unemployable.

        /S sort of

        • Ghostalmedia
          link
          English
          1711 months ago

          35% of the county would totally hire her.

          • @kescusay
            link
            English
            2811 months ago

            Well, not now, she’s turned on the God-Emperor.

            • Hairyblue
              link
              fedilink
              811 months ago

              This. I think her law career is over.
              I can’t imagine what job she’d do now. Or maybe I am wrong and there are still people who’d hire her.

                • @dhork
                  link
                  English
                  611 months ago

                  Don’t forget OnlyFans

                • Hairyblue
                  link
                  fedilink
                  511 months ago

                  I don’t see them wanting her if she turned on Trump. MAGA people will spit after they say her name to get the taste out of their mouth now.

          • ZeroCool
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            35% of the county would totally hire her.

            lol @ thinking the average MAGA chud can afford to hire a lawyer. Also, you forgot the R in country.

    • AlwaysNowNeverNotMe
      link
      fedilink
      1311 months ago

      Oh they just expected the truth later from a trump toady for an immediate legal benefit. So wise.

      • vortic
        link
        45
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Part of her deal was a written statement describing what she will testify to. They don’t give this kind of deal unless the subject has already provided sufficient useful information and sworn to its truthfulness. She’s bound to her statement now and, if she retracts later, I’m sure they can both pull back the plea deal and charge her with perjury.

        These prosecutors aren’t stupid nor is this their first plea deal. They’ve already got the goods.

      • @khepri
        link
        17
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Oh they will absolutely bring the hammer down if she doesn’t do and say everything by the book from this point forward, that’s the point of a plea deal. It gets the defendant out of (most of the) trouble, but it locks them in to testifying fully and truthfully about the case from then on. If the prosecutor/judge thinks they aren’t holding up that promise, the deal is taken away. You really do have to go full state’s evidence if you take a deal like this, and they are not playing around with the threat of piling all those felony charges - and more - right back on you if you don’t sing just the way the DOJ wants you to.