Former President Donald Trump received a $5,000 fine on Friday for violating the gag order put in place by Judge Arthur Engoron to protect his staff and his courtroom’s proceedings.

$5000. What bullshit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    511 year ago

    It doesn’t mean every fine will be $5k, it’s a warning. The judge is saying it’s a serious gag order with consequences, $5k is probably the average fine for first violations.

    There was an open question about what the judge could do about violations of the gag order, it’s just impossible that an ex President goes to jail for violations of a gag order…I’d argue he’s not going regardless, but 100% not going for this. So we have an answer, there will be fines.

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      301 year ago

      If this is the sort of fine he’s going to get, he’ll violate it as often as he can. So this is either bait, or this judge is a fucking idiot.

      • @tburkhol
        link
        401 year ago

        Crimes punished by fines only apply to poor people.

        But if the judge imposes a fine that would be meaningful to a “billionaire,” then he feeds the right-wing narrative of being on a vendetta against Trump. That’s an issue with all the prosecutions, and doubtless part of the reason he seems to get such kid-glove treatment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        It’s not the sort of fine he will get. It’s the fine he’s getting for a first offense for a minor violation (this was something existing since before the gag that was left up).

        It’s a shot across the bow to show that the weapon is loaded and the judge will use it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      Why is it impossible for an ex president to go to jail for contempt of court? He’s just a citizen, now, and a citizen would have their bail revoked.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not literally legally impossible, but the logistics of dealing with Secret Service protection for someone in prison make it extremely difficult, plus it’s obviously unprecedented to put a former president in jail, and the added complication of it being the primary competition to the sitting president in the next election.

        There are a lot of reasons a judge would want to avoid prison, specifically. And the system is set up such that if there are circumstances where there’s a good reason to avoid prison for a certain person, there are alternative punishments like fines or house arrest.

          • @Daft_ish
            link
            -121 year ago

            Literally impossible. The physical and mental demand on everyone involved would be more than any one person could endure.

              • @Daft_ish
                link
                -81 year ago

                The secret service HAS to be there. I don’t know what you don’t understand about that. The secret service HAS to be there. That’s without a doubt. The secret service being there that is.

                  • @Daft_ish
                    link
                    -21 year ago

                    Sorry, don’t mind me. Just trolling.

    • @SpaceNoodle
      link
      111 year ago

      He already had several verbal warnings. This is a joke.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        But verbal warning is different thing as to a legal ruling and actual punishment action, actual real consequences and not just a strongly worded letter. Yeah 5k is meaningless for him, but it demonstrates punishment clauses can be used. Thinking is “this should make him/his lawyers read rest of the punishment scale and that should deter him”.

        If it doesn’t, stronger punishments will be applied.

        • @SpaceNoodle
          link
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My point is that this is piddling and should have been the first or second step, not seventh. At this rate we’re about 200 more incidents away from house arrest.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      The need to double it every time. And keep paying attention so they don’t miss any violations.