Something is wrong if you are resorting to “eye for the eye” phrase. Israel doesn’t do barbarian attacks like what has happened on October 7th. They at least have some experience and instruments for targeted attacks, that will let them avoid as many needless victims as possible. Palestinians are very different from that.
Where exactly do you see pointless cruelty from Israel? Did you read the article or just the headline? No civillians were killed and the case is getting investigated as it should. This is not a massive case.
This is not a revenge. This was a critical point when Israel found it can no longer defend passively against terrorists, so it’s obvious what will happen next.
Something is wrong if you are resorting to “eye for the eye” phrase. Israel doesn’t do barbarian attacks like what has happened on October 7th. They at least have some experience and instruments for targeted attacks, that will let them avoid as many needless victims as possible. Palestinians are very different from that.
Where exactly do you see pointless cruelty from Israel? Did you read the article or just the headline? No civillians were killed and the case is getting investigated as it should. This is not a massive case.
This is not a revenge. This was a critical point when Israel found it can no longer defend passively against terrorists, so it’s obvious what will happen next.
That’s… certainly an interesting claim. Which box of cereal are you getting your news from? I guess all these dead kids are just terrorists-in-bud.
I’m referring to the OP article that we are commenting on. Are you high?
You mean the OP that literally details the things you’re saying either aren’t atrocities or aren’t happening?
Are you high?
And I repeat.
So… babies are terrorists now. Cool. Coolcoolcoolcoolcoool.
What?
You said no civilians were killed. Babies were killed. Ergo by your logic, babies don’t equal civilians.
Scroll up to the OP, read the article. It’s not about babies.