• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    621 year ago

    What I hate with this is that is defines that the army itself is good or bad. But in reality it is what it is used for. If its actually used for defence, then it’s very honorable. When it’s used as a tool to exploit resources to the rich, (aka generally being the aggressor), it’s not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Even simpler than that. People trying to slot sex work/army/any job into “good/bad” columns aren’t worth your attention.

      Except for health insurance CEOs, those definitely bad.

      • cannache
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        But war means more than sacrificing your body or personal reputation. War is giving up your whole personal conscience to fight for what the group believes is the most direct action in response to an event

    • @telllos
      link
      111 year ago

      I mean, even for defence. Your settling, an argument, the rich and powerful people above you are having. You’re settling it with your life.

      • cannache
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        If you think your side is right and you’re ready to die fighting then who is anyone else to say that you, the tool, is wrong?

    • uphillbothways
      link
      fedilink
      -10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      See, that’s an easy question to answer: Did you, or whoever, join the military while the US, or your country, was being attacked?

      • @FireRetardant
        link
        171 year ago

        If you wait til you are attacked, you may not be trained or ready enough to actually defend your country from the attack. You can still join in times of peace with intentions of defense for the future, helping with disaster relief, and providing international aid.