Remember kids, Tankies wants to undermine democracy - same as facists.

  • @masquenox
    link
    71 year ago

    Neither the anarchist revolutions in Ukraine nor Spain seemed to lack “practical steps”… what they did lack, however, was practical steps for turning into a reactionary elite as soon as they seized power - something the Bolsheviks and their ideological spawn seems to have no problems with.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They absolutely did, their inability to coordinate and make compromises during wartime absolutely led to their failures as revolutions.

      • @masquenox
        link
        91 year ago

        Oh… being (respectively) stabbed in the back by Bolsheviks and being sabotaged by Stalin had absolutely nothing to do with it, eh?

        No, tankie… I don’t think you’ve read any anarchist literature at all.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, the Spanish anarchists were unsuccessful because Stalin, and not because they refused to be integrated with the popular front(which even the fucking liberals joined), including militarily until the war was already well lost, which made coordinated actions against the fascists with the popular front impossible

          The lessons of the Spanish civil war dont reflect well on the anarchist movement there.

          • @masquenox
            link
            61 year ago

            Yes, the Spanish anarchists were unsuccessful because Stalin

            Yes. That’s why, tankie. And no… they didn’t lose because they decided not to take orders from your outrageously incompetent and cynical two-faced realpolitking fetish object Stalin.

            Okay?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Okay so how much did you actually study the Spanish civil war because this comes off as really ignorant? Like, what books have you read on the subject that have led you to the conclusion that Stalin was controlling all of the Spanish Republicans except for the anarchists? You seem to deify Stalin much more than me, who generally considers him a very flawed leader who was a better revolutionary, but doesn’t consider him some octopus with his tentacles in literally everything.

              • @masquenox
                link
                51 year ago

                I’m not the one demonstrating weaponized ignorance on the subject, tankie - you are.

                But hey… bring it on.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  411 months ago

                  But hey… bring it on.

                  It is a self dunk to get combative when someone asks you what books you’ve read on a subject you’re opining about

                  • @masquenox
                    link
                    411 months ago

                    Why would I compare books with you, tankie? You’ve already claimed to have read things you so obviously haven’t.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          No, tankie… I don’t think you’ve read any anarchist literature at all.

          so now we are gonna start calling names. Cool, very mature.

          • @masquenox
            link
            511 months ago

            Well, then… what do you think we should call them? Do remember… it was Marxist-Leninists themselves that came up with that term.